The government faces a dilemma over foreign buyout firms. It welcomes the injection of foreign funds to boost the economy and enhance competitiveness, but fears the possible side effects.
Over the past two decades or so, these private equity funds have been crucial in corporate finance and restructuring worldwide. At the same time they have been labeled "vulture funds" for the excessive profits they made.
Private equities had not really targeted Taiwan until recently -- when several of them looked into banks and cable TV networks and saw an opportunity for potential, since the government had been trying to consolidate the financial sector and was pushing the move from analog to digital TV.
But buyout firms may experience a dramatically changed environment in Taiwan this year, as sales of billions of dollars in local equity have prompted a debate over whether foreign funds are touching upon a most sensitive nerve -- cross-strait policy. Do they pose a shock to the system? Or are they simply not paying enough?
Last week, the government's prolonged review of the application by a Carlyle Group-led consortium to buy Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc (ASE) prompted concern from the US-Taiwan Business Council. It warned that Taiwan could lose its attractiveness to foreign funds.
Concerned that Carlyle may consider taking ASE private -- and that other Taiwanese high-tech firms could follow suit to circumvent the bans on China-bound investment -- the Ministry of Economic Affairs has proposed amending the regulations on company buyouts. According to the ministry's preliminary proposal, a thorough examination of buyout firms' applications would be required if they are purchasing up to a 25 percent stake in a local listed company or in firms in the banking, broadcasting and telecommunications sectors.
The National Communications Commission actually took the first step of looking at buyouts more rigorously when it conducted a face-to-face interview with MBK Partners executives last Friday over the firm's proposed investment in China Network Systems Co (CNS), the nation's second-largest cable TV provider. The commission wants to know whether MBK would own more than the 60 percent limit for overseas investors through its indirect holdings in CNS. The commission said the interview, along with its demand for MBK to submit more documentation on the planned acquisition, was to ensure the foreign ownership rules set forth in the Cable Radio and Television Law (
The Carlyle Group, in comparison, was lucky. It did not need an interview last July over its bid for a 59.29-percent stake in Eastern Multimedia Co. The Macquarie Media Group's purchase of Taiwan Broadband Communications (TBC) from Carlyle in December 2005 also met with little regulatory screening except some paper work.
Against this backdrop, one has to wonder what caused the government's shift in attitude? Is Taiwan moving to build a firewall against private equities, as South Korea appears to have done with its probes into Lone Star and other foreign buyout firms for alleged irregularities, or that of China where Carlyle has had trouble in acquiring a construction machinery firm for nearly a year?
Protectionism does appear to be on Taiwan's agenda when it comes to buyout firms. But as long as there are attractive buyout opportunities, private equities will continue to thrive.
But the government needs to be cautious about erecting barriers that could threaten the nation's attractiveness to foreign capital. It should not be just private equities that the government cares about, but the interests of shareholders as well as the health and transparency of the business environment.
China took advantage of the vacuum left behind when US carriers stayed out of the western Pacific Ocean due to COVID-19 outbreaks on several US Navy warships. The Chinese government is solidifying its hold on artificial islands in the South China Sea by moving in missiles and surveillance equipment, and formalizing its occupation by creating two municipal districts in the region under Hainan Island’s Sansha — Xisha District on Woody Island (Yongxing Island, 永興島) to administer the Paracel Islands (Xisha Islands, 西沙群島) and Nansha District on Fiery Cross Reef (Yongshu Reef, 永暑島) to administer the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島) —
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) yesterday wrapped up its annual party conference-cum-national decision-making forums in Beijing: the National People’s Congress (NPC) and National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), known colloquially as the “two meetings.” They are normally tightly choreographed affairs, designed to project an image of stability and unassailable strength, but several events leading up this month’s sessions provided strong indications that all is not well in the state of Denmark. The first sign of major discontent came in March, at the height of the COVID-19 crisis in China, when an article by real-estate tycoon Ren Zhiqiang
As last year drew to a close, Taiwan lost several of its dwindling set of diplomatic allies, and China all but claimed victory in the long quest for universal recognition of the Peoples Republic of China. While Taiwan remained marginalized from traditional international institutions, intensifying protests in Hong Kong raised the specter of military repression in the territories still coveted by Beijing. At celebrations marking 70 years of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) rule, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) also reasserted China’s ultimate goal of reunifying Taiwan with the mainland. Then COVID-19 hit. The pandemic has opened deep wounds in the increasingly
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a