Since Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (
This reveals a misunderstanding of democracy and the rule of law.
To win elections, some politicians would rather sacrifice education and the rule of law for populist agendas offering short-term solutions.
But education cannot be sacrificed; it is the very foundation of a vibrant democracy.
As a visiting professor at a German university, I have witnessed first hand how democracy works in Germany. Democracy is a guiding principle throughout their system.
Taiwan is missing an important ingredient in its democracy -- our politicians are not interested in trying to get to the root of a problem.
Voters love Hau's proposed policy because teachers, parents and students would all benefit in the short term.
Teachers would need less time to prepare lessons, parents would spend less on textbooks, and students would spend less time studying.
In addition, the government would decide the content of the textbooks.
Would this kind of education benefit the nation in the long run?
The fundamental problem plaguing the nation's education lies in the fixation on gaining entry to a top school.
Hau's proposal does not address the problems with our education system. In fact, it is a violation of the Constitution.
Such methods were repeatedly questioned and criticized during the 10-year education reform program.
Before the reform, all textbooks were published by the National Institute for Compilation and Translation (
The problem of textbook content remains, however, and putting an end to interference from political ideologies is a key issue.
If we were to return to the past policy of a single textbook per syllabus, the potential for a political party to influence education would only increase.
Such a problem is not surprising in an authoritarian state. But Taiwan is democratic and has undergone a decade-long educational reform process.
That we are still dealing with problems like political interference in education is simply unacceptable.
Despite the country's democratization, the public and politicians seem to have a hard time shedding the mindset of Taiwan's authoritarian history.
Politicians all believe that their perspective is the correct one, and they are eager to impose their view on the education system.
If we allow them to do so, we are allowing a power that has no place in a democracy.
Hau's proposal would revert to a policy we already fought to shed during the education reform.
Astonishingly, the Taipei City Government seems blissfully unaware that if Hau's proposal were implemented, it would violate the freedom of publication protected by the Constitution.
Since the city authorities are ignoring that fact, our last hope in this matter is the Ministry of Education.
Article 162 of the Constitution states that all public and private educational and cultural institutions in the country shall be subject to state supervision.
The Ministry of Education is bound by the Constitution to supervise the Taipei City Government's Department of Education.
Hsu Yue-dian is a professor in the Department of Law at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
An article on the Nature magazine Web site reports that 22 scientists last month wrote to the daily Dagens Nyheter criticizing Sweden’s no-lockdown response to COVID-19. However, evidence-based analysis shows that a lockdown is not a one-size-fits-all strategy and Sweden is showing the world a sustainable way for everybody to fearlessly live with the virus, which is an inevitable situation that everyone must face and accept for a while. The biggest myth about lockdowns is that they are the only solution when an epidemic worsens. A lockdown is a measure to cordon off a seriously affected area so that people in
On Monday, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) spoke during the opening ceremony of this year’s World Health Assembly (WHA). For the first time in the assembly’s history, attendees, including Xi, had to dial in virtually. Xi made no acknowledgement of the Chinese government’s role in causing the COVID-19 pandemic, nor was there any meaningful apology. Instead, he painted China as a benign force for good and a friend to all nations. Except Taiwan, of course. The address was a reheated version of the speech Xi gave at the 2017 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Xi again attempted to step into the
China’s prevention of Taiwan’s participation as an observer at the World Health Assembly (WHA), the WHO and other UN specialized institutions is misleading the world. China always asserts that UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 established the so-called “one China principle,” in which Taiwan is a province of China. This is fake information that is part of China’s grand external propaganda strategy. Resolution 2758 made clear that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the sole legitimate representative of China at the UN and its specialized institutions. However, there is not a single word related to Taiwan in the resolution, no mention of the