This week marked the second time in as many months that an elderly member of my family nearly lost her life savings to scammers. In the first instance, my aunt actually went down to her bank to withdraw her entire holdings, but was stopped by alert bank officials. The next day the scammers showed up at her house, trying to trick her into handing over her chop, the key to her entire life.
Like horrendous traffic and substandard food, scammers have become part of daily life in Taiwan.
Based in China but connected to local crime gangs, they call with panic-inducing news about bank accounts, hoping to get the unsuspecting in front of an ATM in a state of unthinking agitation, so they can obtain PIN numbers necessary to clean out the victim's account.
Or they may call to say that your son has been kidnapped, with a child piteously wailing in the background. The number and quality of scams evolves constantly, and no one can track them all.
We've grown used to the constant flow of scams, forgetting what an outrage they are.
It is an outrage that every day the newspapers report stories of senior citizens who have lost huge sums, an outrage that local crime gangs go unpunished, an outrage that China permits these syndicates to flourish on its soil.
It's time to put a stop to it.
The scammer issue seems almost tailor-made for positive political action, representing an issue that touches every household on the island, one that no sane person could object to action on.
Since it is unlikely that China will ever move against the syndicates there, it behooves the government to move against the supply of marks.
By reducing the number of individuals willing to fork over money to scammers, the government could make progress on an important issue, and do so on the cheap, gaining easy points with the public.
What the government needs to do is initiate a sustained, long-term program of aggressive advertising and public relations, explaining over and over again how the scammers work, how government agencies work and how to avoid scams.
This should be shown on television and in the print media, especially during the prime-time soaps so popular among the elderly here.
Local celebrities and TV stations should be asked to donate their time on a volunteer basis, reducing costs.
With key elections coming up soon, such a sustained, long-term campaign over the next couple of years would have the salutary effect of making the government look proactive on an issue that impacts upon every life around the nation. Not to mention, of course, the savings in time, money and lives.
Michael Turton
Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing