On Jan. 31, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lin Cho-shui (林濁水) wrote an opinion piece in the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times' sister newspaper) that said that preventing pan-blue voters from participating in the DPP's legislative primary opinion poll shows a lack of ambition. Lin made two mistakes in his argument.
First, he discussed multi-member district elections and single-member district elections as if they were one and the same thing. Second, he expressed the opinion that pursuing and soliciting the support of centrist or even pan-blue voters would demonstrate greater ambition and self-confidence.
For the purposes of my argument, let's assume that Taiwan's voters can be divided into deep-green, light-green, moderate, light-blue and deep-blue camps, with each camp accounting for 20 percent of the vote. Let's also assume that five legislators will be chosen in any given electoral district, with the DPP nominating three candidates -- a deep green, a light green and a moderate -- and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) nominating a deep blue, a light blue and a moderate.
If these six candidates managed to successfully align their political views with the preferences of their target voters, then those targeting the deep-green, light-green, light-blue and deep-blue segments would all be elected. The two candidates that target moderate voters would have a 50-percent chance of winning the remaining seat.
If the parties want to win three seats in this district, they would have to meet the preferences of centrist voters who sometimes vote blue and sometimes green.
The situation with two political parties or two candidates competing in a single-member district election is, however, a very different proposition. Some people may feel prompted to cite the median voter theory proposed by Anthony Downs in 1957, which states that the only chance to win an election is to court median voters.
However, this is a misinterpretation. Downs' theory makes six fundamental assumptions. The first assumption is that there is a single political dimension extending from light to dark. Second, that voters' political preferences do not change. Third, political parties can win an election by adjusting their convictions. Fourth, voters vote for the party with the political convictions most similar to their own. Fifth, all voters vote. Sixth, there are no tangible or intangible opportunity costs involved in voting.
Based on these assumptions, Downs concluded that policy suggestions proposed by opposing political parties would converge toward the center and eventually become identical. Thus, selecting which party will emerge victorious in an election is difficult, although median voters are certain to be the winners.
Downs' theory has incurred a great amount of criticism. If his second, fifth or sixth assumptions do not prove true, the theory cannot accurately predict an election's outcome. If voters can choose to abstain from voting and have to sacrifice their personal time and money to vote, then the political opinions of median voters could have a very negative impact.
Furthermore, if a party moved toward the position of centrist voters, it could make its original supporters feel they were wasting their time by voting, which could lead to a large number of them deciding not to vote.
Rather than moving toward the center of the political spectrum, the DPP should hold onto its convictions and embrace its long-standing supporters while promoting its ideals to centrist voters. This is what it means to be ambitious and this is the way to victory.
Lin Chia is an independent economics commentator.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under