Abbe Pierre, the radical priest with the black beret who became the conscience of the French nation, died on Jan. 22. Not a single Taiwanese newspaper mentioned his death. But at his funeral ceremony at Notre Dame de Paris in France, French President Jacques Chirac and members of his government, representatives from the opposition parties, intellectuals and the public formed a huge crowd.
His death was deeply moving because he dedicated his life to fighting for universal solidarity across the lines of nationality, race and religion.
Abbe Pierre was not perfect, as the Taipei Times knew well. Two years ago the paper reprinted an article from the Guardian ("Sex confessions of `saint' shock French Catholics," Oct. 29, 2005, page 6).
The article implied that his "sex confessions" were as important as his fight for human rights and democracy.
The photo that accompanied the article was also misleading, because Abbe Pierre, 93, was flanked by women belonging to his secular organization for the homeless, Emma, which recycled and sold unwanted objects.
I wonder why journalists and editors persist in denying the public non-misleading, objective reporting.
I assume that editors and journalists are part of the class of Taiwanese intellectuals and as such I think it is fair to expect better.
Local newspapers barely mentioned the seventh World Social Forum in Nairobi. Instead, they focused on the World Economic Forum, without even informing the public about the differences between the two.
The World Social Forum is an open meeting place, where movements from civil society meet to discuss concrete actions on the local and international level to solve problems such as poverty, social inequality and environmental devastation that are the by-products of globalization.
I wonder whether any Taiwanese have participated in this kind of forum to understand and support an alternative process of globalization. I don't understand why so many intellectuals and government officials are neglecting such an important issue.
Another article also caught my attention. When I read a recent Taipei Times article about plagiarism, ("Ethical Problems Concern Academics," Jan. 24, page 2), I noticed that an anatomy professor in one of the nation's most prestigious medical institutions spoke on the condition of anonymity in an interview.
He indicated that the academic world's "publish or perish" mentality may have forced researchers to risk their careers and integrity by manipulating the results of their work.
In that article, an assistant professor of public health said professors were overloaded with teaching hours.
The article reads: "Most ... time is now spent on teaching classes and preparing for classes ... which leaves very little time to perform quality research."
Why do professors accept this unreasonable situation?
The above examples prove that most Taiwanese intellectuals lack critical thinking and are reluctant to think outside the box. This is not suitable in a democratic system. It will no doubt take its toll on the public's awareness of important issues and social development in Taiwan.
What exactly is the mission of intellectuals?
"Intellect" comes from the Latin verb "intellegere," meaning to use "cognitive ability" and to "delve into ideas, books, the essence of the mind."
So an intellectual is supposed to read, understand what she or he is reading and check the genuineness of the content. The intellectual should then put knowledge to use to improve society. Being an intellectual is not something to cast aside as soon as one gets a diploma. An intellectual never stops learning and fighting for the improvement of society.
The intellectual must even be ready to sacrifice her or his own life for this goal. We cannot demand that intellectuals be perfect, but they must be brave and humanist. Abbe Pierre was a good example.
I sincerely hope Taiwanese intellectuals can gather the courage to carry out their ideals. I believe that they have cognitive ability that they could use if they wanted to. Their abilities should not be obstructed by a lack of openmindness. They have the potential to fight for mankind with a critical mind.
An outrageous dismissal of the exemplary Taiwanese fight against COVID-19 has been perpetrated by the EU. There is no excuse. I presume that everyone who reads the Taipei Times knows that the EU has excluded Taiwan from its so-called “safe list,” which permits citizens unhindered travel to and from the countries of the EU. As the EU does not feel that it needs to explain the character of this exclusive list, perhaps we should examine it ourselves in some detail. There are 14 nations on the list that have been chosen as safe countries of origin and safe countries of destination for
Filmmakers in Taiwan used to struggle when it came to telling a story that could resonate internationally. Things started to change when the 2017 drama series The Teenage Psychic (通靈少女), a collaboration between HBO Asia and Taiwanese Public Television Service (PTS), became a huge hit not just locally, but also internationally. The coming-of-age story was adapted from the 2013 PTS-produced short film The Busy Young Psychic (神算). Entirely filmed in Taiwan, the Mandarin-language series even made it on HBO’s streaming platforms in the US. It is proof that a well-told Taiwanese story can absolutely win the hearts and minds of hard-to-please
Drugged with sedatives, handcuffed and wearing a bright orange prison tunic, British fraud investigator and former journalist Peter Humphrey was escorted by warders into an interrogation room filled with reporters, locked inside a steel cage and fastened to a metal “tiger chair.” Humphrey recalls: “I was completely surrounded by officers, dazed, manacled and with cameras pointing at me through the bars. I was fighting for my life like a caged animal. It was horrifying.” Footage from the interrogation was later artfully edited to give the appearance of a confession and broadcast on Chinese state media. While this might sound like an
The US House of Representatives on July 1 passed by unanimous consent a bipartisan bill that would penalize Chinese officials who implement Beijing’s new national security legislation in Hong Kong, as well as banks that do business with them. The following day, the US Senate unanimously passed the bill, which was later sent to the White House, where it awaits US President Donald Trump’s signature. The bill does not spell out what the sanctions would look like and Trump has yet to sign it into law, but Reuters on Thursday last week reported that five major Chinese state lenders are considering