This is not a real article. This is an exercise.
Patient Zero in the 2007 avian flu pandemic died at 9:25 on Wednesday morning.
It caused little fuss in the war room of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) when it was announced.
In part, the death was expected -- there had been hints of what was coming in this first avian flu drill to involve the whole agency. Patient Zero was a fictional 22-year-old Georgetown University student who had just returned from visiting his family in Indonesia. The object of the drill was to determine how the CDC would respond in a real epidemic.
So for the agency, the patient's death was beside the point; what was important was the diagnosis of avian flu. The question for Julie Gerberding, the agency's director, and her staff was whether it marked the beginning of a full-blown pandemic.
How many of the student's 10 roommates had he infected? How about the 40 others on the Georgetown swim team? One of them appeared to be dying in New York after a swim meet at Columbia University. And the woman in Chicago who had died after being on his plane from Jakarta -- were they all linked?
This was the CDC's first "full functional [internal]" avian flu exercise, meaning that virtually everyone at its headquarters here was involved in some way, including about 100 people packing the operations center, where banks of computers and phones faced a wall full of television screens.
A major threat
There has never been a case of avian flu reported in the US, and it has not mutated into a pandemic strain. But it killed more people last year in Asia than it did in 2005 and in 2004, and public health experts consider it a major threat.
Four reporters, from the New York Times, the Washington Post, The Associated Press and The Canadian Press, were allowed in to watch the exercise (and even to comment on how well CDC public affairs officers played reporters during a mock news conference).
"This is new for us," Gerberding said. "A lot of people feel it's really high-risk to let the press look inside the sausage factory while the sausage is being made."
Instead, she said, she decided to stand the scrutiny even if mistakes were seen, partly to prod states and localities to conduct similar drills, and partly because news coverage of such a crisis "can make or break your credibility, and give the feeling that no one's in charge."
Reporters, she explained, need to understand how hard it is to make medical decisions based on a thin trickle of facts.
Like an episode of the television program 24, the drill was supposed to be taking place in real time. So the reporters, freed at 6pm to write up what they had seen, had no idea how it would all play out. Did millions die? Did I? The answer will not be known for months, since the scenario is supposed to play on indefinitely, with new drills meshing with it.
Nine probable cases
By day's end, though, things were getting rapidly worse: Hospitals in Indonesia were overwhelmed. Another country that officials would not name, because they had been given the information in a top-secret briefing, seemed to have an outbreak, too. A severely ill passenger had been taken off a flight from Singapore in Hawaii. There were only nine probable cases, but three of the victims were already dead (The 1918 flu killed only about 2 percent of its victims).
The day's last debate was over whether to divert all planes headed for the US with sick passengers from Indonesia to one of 20 airports where they could be screened by medical teams.
The economic disruption would be vast, and possibly premature, and would cause panic. One sick passenger could be a coincidence or a second "infection seed" like the Georgetown student.
The team decided to wait for laboratory tests on the patient and see what the Federal Aviation Agency had to say.
There were light moments. Top CDC officials could use some remedial geography -- they seemed a little unclear about what borough Columbia University is in (hint: It's the long thin one) and where Borneo is.
And there were movie-within-the-movie moments, like when Gerberding asked if the CDC had a local State Department liaison, got a noncommittal answer and then insisted: "No, I mean in the real world. Do we?"
Or when the reporters explained that real reporters would have been more confused about the facts (and ruder) than the CDC staff members who played reporters in the mock news conference.
At that conference, Gerberding, who can be clear and incisive in questioning her own top staff, seemed less sure of herself and wary of eye contact as soon as her midlevel staff began playing the press.
Health emergency
Gerberding said she intended to display less alarm than she felt. She drew a distinction between a public health emergency, which she had declared, and a pandemic, which she had not.
Some actions she had taken in the afternoon, like releasing the national Tamiflu stockpile to the states, were not really questioned at the mock news conference.
And though Gerberding was nominally in charge, the man pulling the strings was in a little room upstairs known as the Simulation Cell.
He was Pete Taylor, a 69-year-old retired general who spent 34 years running war games for the Pentagon and now does it for MPRI, a consulting group with many former military officers on staff.
His team tossed new facts into the scenario every hour or so, forcing the CDC to react. On that team was a doctor who played a WHO official in a conference call (he wished the US "all the best with your outbreak").
If the scenario had called for it, Taylor could have provided a mock US President George W. Bush.
"The secret in training," Taylor said, "is to keep the carrot in front of their nose."
"Just far enough so they keep reaching for it, but not so far out that they get demoralized," he said.
The exercise was scheduled to end on the morning of Feb. 1, and then Taylor's team would write an "after-action report" while the CDC did its own analysis of what went right and wrong.
Future exercises may draw in officials from city or state health departments.
Asked whether the human race survives, Taylor gave only a hint: The exercise never really ends.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.