Voting with your fists
Dear Johnny,
Having spent some years living in Taiwan and now residing back in Europe, it pains my heart to see the kind of appalling representation of Taiwan as illustrated on the UK's Sky News article of a full-scale brawl in the legislature. This is the kind of advertisement that makes Taiwan a laughingstock around the world.
While passions always have and always will run high in the arena of politics, elected officials are at the forefront of any society and so simply must behave in a rational manner, if for nothing else than to act with dignity for those they represent -- the people of Taiwan.
People on this side of the world are not so much appalled at the childish behavior of elected officials as they are amazed that the general population tolerates it. Officials who block bills for purely personal or political reasons, or those who either from frustration or just plain ignorance turn to violence, have no business representing a kiddies' little-league team, let alone a fragile country like Taiwan.
If this happened in a communist country, blame would fall solely on unelected officials. In Taiwan, these repeated incidents are seen as representative of the people. A reality of democracy: You get what you choose.
Irish Tony
Johnny replies: True words. But consider this: The legislature is the only place in Taiwan you will see such behavior. Maybe these turkeys offer a vision of Hell so stark and embarrassing that the population is chastened to act like the civilized people they are.
Seriously, the legislature may be a joke at times, if not a lot of the time, but there are reasons for this, and these reasons are never discussed by the chortling anchors who present the footage for comic relief at the end of a news bulletin.
One of them is that the blue-green divide cannot agree on how to dignify the chamber through a code of conduct. The other is that some of the legislation we are talking about is among the most obnoxious attacks on democratic principles you are likely to see. Proposing a law to place control of the Central Election Commission in the hands of the majority party? Hell, I'd just about start a fight to stop that myself.
Follow the real money
Dear Johnny,
I was wondering if you know what happened to the NT$60 million that remained from the Shih Ming-teh (
Maybe you should go out and investigate. Perhaps it's possible to get him for fraud.
Marc Van Lommel
Johnny replies: Well, as I wrote a while ago, Shih is back in Taipei and pretending to be an ascetic guru. And it's terribly hard for Shih these days to get any attention because his campaign has been wiped off the news pages and the cable news schedule by the flight of Wang You-theng (
Anyway, you know why Shih would never be prosecuted (if he were guilty, cough cough) under a DPP government? Because these DPP saps would be stricken at condemning one of their own "long marchers" to prison all over again. You see, Marc, despite their myriad failings, the DPP bunch are basically like your average politician in the West. A bit ignorant, a bit selfish, a bit gormless, a bit phony, a bit corrupt and a bit irritating. But all in all, they're just people, and they wouldn't launch a Cultural Revolution, or inform on their relatives or purge their party icons out of personal spite or ideological mania. There are basic, human standards that stay upheld.
Anyway, if I knew exactly what had happened to the money, I would have already demanded a cut in exchange for my silence. I'm no fool.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations