The world's oldest newspaper, Sweden's Post- och Inrikes Tidningar, has embraced the digital age, ending its run as a print publication and opting to be published exclusively on the Internet.
Founded in 1645 by Queen Christina, the Post- och Inrikes Tidningar (PoIT) -- or Post and Domestic Newspapers -- was a staple for readers in Sweden from the late 17th century to the 18th century.
But its readership dwindled as rival newspapers appeared, confining PoIT by the 1900s primarily to the publication of announcements from publicly listed companies, and financial and legal institutions.
While the paper has not covered news stories for more than 100 years, the World Association of Newspapers recognizes PoIT as the world's oldest newspaper still in publication.
In its electronic format, launched on Jan. 1, PoIT remains the official news organ of the government -- a role enshrined in Swedish law -- as it has been since the 17th century.
"The change in format is of course a major departure, for some possibly a little sad, but it is also a natural step," PoIT's new editor-in-chief Roland Haegglund said.
Haegglund said he believed the move to the Internet would breathe new life into the paper.
"It will definitely widen our readership. Now anyone with Internet access can read PoIT free of charge," said Haegglund, the sole full-time employee of the paper since its incorporation into Bolagsverket, the Swedish Companies Registration Office, at the beginning of the year.
"You couldn't just chance upon the print version. Now everyone has the chance to be informed," he said.
Royal roots
"It was Queen Christina and her chancellor, Axel Oxenstierna, who started the paper in 1645," said Hans Holm, the last editor-in-chief of the newsprint format.
Taxes levied by the Swedish government for its participation in the Thirty Years' War (1618-1648) against what is now Germany had drained the population's assets, causing widespread misery.
"Oxenstierna realized there was discontent in the country. They were forced to report where all the money was going," Holm said.
As information became more available, PoIT broadened its international and domestic news coverage and included information on illnesses and the Swedish exchange rate.
The paper also published weather observations, poetry and serialized novels, but never pictures or advertisements.
"By the 18th century it was a fully news-based paper," Holm explained.
PoIT enjoyed a monopoly in news coverage until the emergence of competitors such as Aftonbladet in 1879, which remains one of Sweden's leading daily tabloids.
Competition
As the number of rival newspapers multiplied, PoIT reduced its news content and by the early 1900s it was no longer the paper of reference for Sweden's news-reading public.
In its final years in print, public company announcements were taking up between 20 and 30 pages -- often more than half the paper. The remainder was devoted to material such as announcements of legal proceedings and the Swedish royal family's official engagements.
In 1978, the paper adopted the booklet format and the final print version of the paper -- published on Dec. 29 -- had a circulation of some 1,500.
PoIT's primary subscribers are banks, courts, lawyers, libraries, and local and national authorities.
With a view to cutting costs, Sweden's justice ministry launched an enquiry into PoIT's future which led in October 2005 to a decision by parliament to transfer responsibility for the running of the paper to Bolagsverket.
The move also ushered in the paper's changeover from its print version to a purely Web-based edition from Jan. 1.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations