Some in the media have said that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators have been circulating a petition asking that party primaries for the December legislative elections be conducted using polls that filter out pan-blue camp voters.
They want to purify the views of the DPP by excluding the deep blue, light blue and centrist voters who make up nearly 50 percent of the electorate. Their objective is simple and reasonable -- they do not want non-DPP voters to participate in the party's nomination process and thereby affect the party's legislative nominations.
They fear that pan-blue voters will either choose weak candidates who will not be able to compete against their pan-blue camp opponents or candidates who are pan-blue fellow travelers. This recommendation has provoked controversy within the DPP and if it is adopted it will have a profound and far-reaching effect on the party.
If the DPP ratifies the petition, the party will have effectively marginalized itself by drawing a boundary down the middle of the electorate. The party will not only lose ground in the legislative elections but will also have trouble winning support from light blue voters on the other side of that boundary in next year's presidential election.
Despite the many critiques focusing on the issue of polling, what really matters is not the methodology by which the polling is carried out. In fact, the DPP's polling methods are quite mature.
All candidates can send their own people to supervise party polling as it unfolds, building trust in the process. The real problem lies with the thinking behind this proposal. It is a logic of self-limitation that divides voters into the polarized blocs of pan-blue and pan-green voters.
While this mentality will not succeed in keeping so-called ideological outsiders out of the DPP's legislative nomination process, it will succeed in lessening the party's chances of staying in power.
This attempt at purifying the party will only result in distancing it from the the people. In the new single-seat legislative districts, the DPP will need to appeal to mainstream voters to win seats. A rule excluding pan-blue voters will only serve to drive the DPP and mainstream voter sentiment apart.
During the DPP's rise to power, the people became the legitimate source of the power to rule. By limiting primary polling, the DPP is ignoring the trends that led it to victory in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections and to near-parity with the pan-blue camp in the legislature. Success was not achieved with the support of deep green voters alone.
This mentality of seeing everyone as either blue or green is leading the DPP to abandon the principle of wellbeing for the greatest number in favor of the greatest benefits for the fewest.
It is the mentality of vested interests and one that will put the party into conflict with popular opinion.
The legislative elections will be the first test of the new single-member district, double-ballot system. Before campaigning has even begun, incumbent legislators are competing to influence the reconfiguration of electoral districts.
This could lead to gerrymandering, a controversial redistricting of electoral districts to suit a specific candidate. It is also leading potential candidates in all of the proposed 73 districts to compete with other potential candidates from the DPP to move to a district where they expect to have a higher chance of winning.
This is already leading to fierce competition in what are seen as popular electoral districts. In turn, this begs the question or how candidates within the same party will heal the wounds caused during the intra-party primaries. Other questions are how, in the name of inter-party competition in each district, the party will talk candidates into running in unpopular districts, and how they will gain the largest possible number of legislator-at-large seats based on their overall percentage of the vote.
Over the past six years, the DPP has met obstruction by the pan-blue camp, while at the international level Beijing has done its utmost to intimidate and coerce Taiwan. Ruling the nation is no walk in the park, but breaking the current blue-green confrontation is just another stage in the historic mission to make Taiwanese their own masters.
Is the DPP going to perpetuate the division of Taiwan into a pan-blue north and a pan-green south, or will it tolerate dissension for the sake of the nation?
Rather than see the political battleground in binary terms, we should look at the situation as if it involved competition between two companies marketing and selling politics. This could help the government integrate some of the pan-blue thinking and move toward cooperation.
Liu Dsih-chi is an associate professor in the Department of International Business at Asia University.
Translated by Michael Fahey and Lin Ya-ti
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry