Few have HAD kind words for former DPP legislator Lin Cho-shui (
But economic growth does not necessarily entail the creation of new jobs. When economic growth fails to relieve unemployment, it is known as jobless growth. This has been the case in the Taiwan. Even though the nation's overall economic growth has been reasonably good, unemployment has not declined significantly and income disparity has increased.
To a certain extent, jobless growth and income disparity have been caused by policies encouraging capital and technology-intensive industries to develop.
Data shows that in 1986, GDP growth was directly related to the creation of new jobs. For each percentage point of GDP growth, the rate of employment increased by 0.38 percent. In the 1990s, the corresponding employment increase fell to just 0.19 percent. Now, it would seem to be even lower.
In his new book Community: Taiwan Under the Sign of the World, Lin examines economic issues in the context of globalization and the US-China-Taiwan IT supply chain. This approach leads him to see jobless growth as being inevitable.
While Lin's approach is interesting, Taiwan's options are not limited to jobless growth.
In 1998, a Chinese Academy Of Science task force made a number of policy recommendations in a study entitled "Employment and Development: The Chinese Unemployment Question and Employment Strategies."
These recommendations included making lower unemployment rates an economic policy objective at every level of government.
Lin -- and the entire DPP administration for that matter -- should think carefully about the academy's recommendation to make low unemployment a top priority.
But the government has never really made employment its top economic priority. The technocrats who oversaw the economy under the KMT believed that growth solved all problems, and the DPP thinks the same way now. The reality though is that income disparities are widening unacceptably for any democratic government. The DPP began its rise to power as a champion of the poor and cannot continue to allow the rich-poor gap to widen.
The overseers of a nation's economy should balance economic growth and market efficiency with equitable distribution.
The DPP leadership must not fall into the trap of "economic development first" -- the credo of the KMT's economic planners. Instead, they should take the issue of economic justice seriously.
In 2001, US President George W. Bush was received by late pope John Paul II, who asked Bush to narrow the world's enormous rich-poor gap.
At the end of that same year, a group of US religious leaders of different faiths delivered a joint statement to the US government demanding global economic justice and proclaiming five major principles. These included demanding that international trade and investment systems not violate the dignity of the human person, protecting the most vulnerable and opening negotiations and decision-making to to those most affected by them.
The statement also called for world trade that respects civil society and the right of local communities to pursue sustainable development of their resources.
Greed is the essence of capitalism. If Lin had thought about this more seriously, his vision of the nation would have been a more equitable one.
Lin Kuo-hua is a pseudonym for a National Taiwan University academic who wishes to remain anonymous.
TRANSLATED BY MICHAEL FAHEY
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under