A few days ago, a labor insurance provision related to pregnancy leave passed its first reading in the Legislative Yuan. In the future, another two months of paid maternity leave will be granted. A recent article in the Liberty Times, the Taipei Times' sister newspaper, argued that shifting the responsibility of covering maternity leave compensation from employers to the labor insurance would be no different from placing the onus on employees themselves, which makes the provision an accomplice in the oppression of workers. The article also argued that it is a gift from legislators that will bleed workers and please businesses.
The paper clearly believes that the passage of the new maternity leave-related provision is by and large no different from helping employers shuffle their responsibilities onto the shoulders of employees. I would like to offer a few suggestions from a different perspective.
The discrimination against pregnant women in the workplace has long been a serious problem that impacts career women of childbearing age. According to statistics published by the Council of Labor Affairs, complaints related to women's pregnancy made up 53.83 percent of all the cases of discrimination complaints handled by employment discrimination evaluation committees in Taiwan from 1991 to 1993.
Labor law in the UK, France, Finland, Norway, Denmark and other European nations provide salary compensation for pregnant employees from social welfare funds, rather than placing the onus on to employers. In order to resolve the pregnancy discrimination problem facing Taiwanese women, many women's groups have long advocated using public financial sources to pay the salary compensation of female workers on maternity leave.
In other words, they think that the pregnancy should be considered a matter of national interest. Thus, the responsibility for relevant costs should be shared by society as a whole, rather than foisting the responsibility off onto employers. This idea has also won the support of labor groups. It was passed by the Cabinet's Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development and it also recently passed a first legislative reading.
I want to clarify that the idea of using public funds to pay salary compensation for career women on maternity leave is based on the insurance's risk-sharing functions, rather than on exploiting laborers. Under today's labor insurance program, 70 percent of the premiums are paid by employers, 20 percent by employees and only 10 percent by the government. In other words, employers still pay most of the premiums. Thus, it is incorrect to say that the burden is shifted onto employees.
Furthermore, covering maternity leave compensation through the labor insurance will also benefit women who do not have a single employer or who are self-employed and thus pay their own insurance. Under the new system these women will also be entitled to maternity leave. The new provision will also ease the discrimination problems for the majority of easily replaceable female workers of childbearing age with low salaries.
Making pregnancy a public issue is an advanced idea adopted by societies around the world who pursue gender equality. Pregnancy is not a personal matter, but a social matter, especially in these days of declining birth rates.
To summarize, salary compensation for female laborers on maternity leave should be covered by the government and the public through social insurance. This will alleviate pregnancy discrimination in the workplace.
Huang Yi-ling is a member of the Taiwan Women's Link and an assistant to Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Huang Sue-ying (
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.