Instead of serving as a catalyst for change in how businesses and banks are regulated, the Rebar Group scandal has turned into yet another bout of self mutilation for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
After the resignation of Financial Supervisory Commission Chairman Shih Jun-ji (
But why should Su step down to take responsibility for the actions of a crooked businessman? And what can the Cabinet do to prevent corrupt individuals from secretly embezzling funds and fleeing the country? To date, no one has come up with an answer for either of these questions.
In their clamor to find a fall guy, people have overlooked the fact that the swift action taken by Su and his Cabinet brought an immediate end to any adverse effects the scandal was having on investor confidence and the nation's financial markets.
And thankfully, all the speculation about Su's future was deflated on Sunday when the president gave the premier his full backing.
So where did the hullabaloo about the premier stepping down originate?
It stemmed largely from two sources. First, the pro-China pan-blue media, which circle like vultures waiting for the slightest hint of a problem, ready to discredit the government, criticize politicians and demand their resignations. They are almost too ravenous in their hunger to peck at Su, the person viewed by the opposition as the DPP's strongest candidate for the 2008 presidential election.
The effectiveness of these organizations in shaping the direction of local news cannot be underestimated. This has been exemplified by the way the focus has quickly been diverted onto the government and who should go rather than the systemic flaws that allowed the scandal to happen and the illegal behavior of Rebar Group founder Wang You-theng (
But the second and by far the largest culprit is the DPP itself, with party infighting at the root of the whole episode.
Despite passing a resolution last July aimed at dissolving the party's many factions, internal rivalries still exist and it is these that are aiding the opposition in working to topple Su.
It goes without saying that members of the former Welfare State Faction and supporters of former Kaohsiung mayor Frank Hsieh (
But Su is a strong character and the latest rumors are like water off a duck's back. However, the individuals who started such rumors and untruths should be aware that their gossip-mongering is damaging the party.
The DPP has endured a torrid time in the media since assuming power, with various corruption cases and scandals making the headlines. The party's standing and image as an alternative to the previous regime has taken a hit in the minds of the electorate. More bad press will only cause more harm to the party.
What the DPP needs in the run up to next year's presidential election is a period of stability.
But as long as the big four -- Su, Hsieh, Vice President Annette Lu (
If the party's leaders had any clue, they would put an end to all this and choose a candidate for 2008 as soon as possible before the party does itself some serious damage.
An article on the Nature magazine Web site reports that 22 scientists last month wrote to the daily Dagens Nyheter criticizing Sweden’s no-lockdown response to COVID-19. However, evidence-based analysis shows that a lockdown is not a one-size-fits-all strategy and Sweden is showing the world a sustainable way for everybody to fearlessly live with the virus, which is an inevitable situation that everyone must face and accept for a while. The biggest myth about lockdowns is that they are the only solution when an epidemic worsens. A lockdown is a measure to cordon off a seriously affected area so that people in
On Monday, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) spoke during the opening ceremony of this year’s World Health Assembly (WHA). For the first time in the assembly’s history, attendees, including Xi, had to dial in virtually. Xi made no acknowledgement of the Chinese government’s role in causing the COVID-19 pandemic, nor was there any meaningful apology. Instead, he painted China as a benign force for good and a friend to all nations. Except Taiwan, of course. The address was a reheated version of the speech Xi gave at the 2017 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Xi again attempted to step into the