The nation is struggling with financial problems and solving them should be a top priority for the government.
Welfare should always be a top priority.
Legislation must be just and disadvantaged groups must be the first priority of welfare.
But the pan-blue camp in the legislature is trying to promote "financial redistribution" by proposing legislation that would allocate NT$1.5 trillion (US$45.5 billion) to the reconstruction of old army communities.
The welfare of disadvantaged veterans should of course be a concern for the legislature. Yet the question is whether the legislation the pan-blue camp is trying to push through is a real attempt to help a disadvantaged group, or whether it unfairly prioritizes one small group in society.
To this day, workers, farmers and fishermen have not received the same level of attention from welfare policies that veterans enjoy.
This cannot continue.
The legislation would be extremely harmful to all taxpayers and the blatant unfairness of the subsidies could lead to social tensions.
The Taiwan Society urges pan-blue politicians to stop following an agenda based on partisan political interests that will increase the unfairness of privileges granted to small parts of society.
Like the debate over the reform of the 18 percent preferential savings interest rate for military personnel, civil servants and government-employed teachers, the veteran welfare issue is a product of past historical circumstances.
These issues are part of the transitional justice complex and can only be given fair and rational treatment if they are considered within that context.
Some veterans are disadvantaged and some are privileged. The welfare of disadvantaged veterans should be considered and handled within the government's general welfare system for all disadvantaged groups.
In other words, the question of who is disadvantaged should be determined based on social class.
This is clearly a matter of transitional justice.
The pan-blue camp first created a problem and then tried to pass legislation to serve its own interests, while ignoring the demands posed by transitional justice.
This is unfair both to veterans and Mainlanders and shows a blatant disregard for the nation's financial situation and the welfare of the general public.
Similar incidents have shown that Taiwanese society does not care about transitional justice. Moreover, it still has to show concern even for a fundamental transition from the past.
The Taiwan Society calls on people from all sectors of society to work together to monitor both the governing and opposition camps and to work to promote transitional justice.
The pan-blue camp decision to push for this legislation also smacks of a politics of hatred.
Simply put, the opposition is using an astronomical sum as bait to raise the expectations of veterans.
The pan-blue camp knows that if these expectations are not met, the resulting disappointment will be blamed on the pan-green camp.
It knows this will foster bitterness against the pan-green government.
This would create what the pan-blue camp sees as unwavering, loyal supporters.
This kind of deceptive, selfish politicking shows a disregard for the nation's financial situation and the welfare of the general public.
The Taiwan Society calls on veterans to behave honorably and refuse to become the vehicle of an attempt to foster anger.
Stop the manipulative politicians behind legislation that would spend tax money unfairly.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and