The US' policy flip-flop on Taiwan continues with American Institute in Taiwan Director Stephen Young's recent push on two fronts -- Taiwan's arms purchase and direct cross-strait links. Legislative approval of the former would have a positive bearing on US security interests, but the latter could result in Taipei's sharp tilt toward Beijing and away from Washington -- a move that could have far-reaching implications on US-Japanese concerns.
The only common thread in the two seemingly incongruent elements is Young's duty as an employee of the US State Department charged with advancing US commerce.
Although Taiwan's arms purchase would profit US weapons suppliers, the benefits of direct cross-strait links for US multinationals would be fleeting at best.
Closer Beijing-Taipei relations could speed up the marginalization of Taiwan, and Tai-wan's intellectual and monetary contributions as an independent and democratic nation could quickly vanish.
To head off the dreaded isolation, President Chen Shui-bian's (
There are talks in the US that the split in last month's municipal elections might boost the chances of the arms package being approved. That is nothing more than wishful thinking given the pan blue-dominated legislature's avowed goal of blocking the arms bill, and allowing the bill to pass would run counter to their objective of never taking up arms against their brethren in China.
And it didn't stop there: The legislature gave its thumbs-down to all long-stalled projects barely 10 days after the polls.
As a concession to the ruling party, the pan-blue coalition grudgingly let the arms proposal take a small step forward in the waning days of last year, but showed no sign that its "delay and obstruct" tactics would permanently end.
Despite the concession, the failure to pass a full arms budget before the end of last year was no less a slap in the face for Washington, which had conveyed its message through Young's talk earlier.
Washington could punish Taiwan by downgrading US-Taiwan military cooperation as it had threatened. That, however, would eventually have the net effect of pushing Taiwan into Beijing's orbit and leaving a huge gap in the US-Western Pacific defense chain with their attendant impact on US national security.
While being a loss-loss proposition for both Taiwan and the US, this would scarcely be a chastisement to the pan blues who have been yearning for exactly such an outcome. Deploying such a stick would be like throwing the baby out with the bathwater while the culprit who dirtied the water cheers on.
It's even more ludicrous considering that there exists a surefire "carrot" -- a US-Taiwan free-trade agreement. The FTA could be the most effective enticement for breaking up the pan-blue hold on the arms bill. Taiwan's big businesses -- the KMT's traditional patrons -- would likely succumb if they they were presented with the choice of the US inking an FTA contingent on the passage of the arms bill.
The fact remains that the current arms package is too important to be left to the fickle discretion of a legislative majority that appears bent on manipulating it as a political tool, and stymieing it as a way to please Beijing.
For the US, this could culminate in another sterling moment when a well-orchestrated trade policy plays a vital role in bolstering national security.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs