Paranoia begets plagiarism
Dear Johnny,
Re: Graham Finch's letter (Johnny Neihu's Mailbag, Jan. 6, page 8). Could you be getting a tad paranoid? Understandably, of course, since Taiwan has real enemies out to get it. Seems to me that the author of the article in the Independent just got his geography wrong, and the island neighbor across the Strait with the excellent high-speed railway he had in mind is Japan (oops, wrong body of water).
The New York Times article on the high speed rail was also pretty objectionable. It spent most of its coverage focusing on complaints about the line, and relatively little on the advantages. Perhaps a future Johnny column could ask readers to find a story in which a foreign newspaper finds something to praise about Taiwan? Just a thought.
June Teufel Dreyer
Department of Political Science
University of Miami
Johnny replies: You might be right about the paranoia, June, but there's more to this than even my free-associating, conspiracy theory-addled brain could have imagined.
As it happens, just after my column was published last week, I discovered unfortunate similarities between the Independent article ("Japan's bullet train reaches Taiwan at a cost of ?7.7bn," Jan. 5) and the New York Times piece ("Taiwan's bullet trains can't outrun controversy," Jan. 4).
Consider these excerpts, for example (I haven't got the space to list every suspect passage because there are a lot of them):
The New York Times (dateline: Taipei, Dec. 28): "The system has become so complex that the leader of Taiwan's consumer movement is calling for citizens to boycott it entirely until extensive safety data is released.
`Cherish your life, don't be a guinea pig,' Cheng Jen-hung, the chairman of the Consumers' Foundation, said in an interview [ie, with the New York Times], repeating his group's slogan. With 900 passengers on a fully loaded train, he warned, `if there is an accident, there will be very heavy casualties.'
Arthur Chiang, the vice president for administration at Taiwan High Speed Rail, said the system was completely safe. But he acknowledged that the project had been bedeviled by opposition."
Now let's look at the Independent (no dateline): "The organisation has become so complex that the leader of Taiwan's consumer movement is urging a boycott until safety data is released.
`Cherish your life, don't be a guinea pig,' says Cheng Jen-hung, chairman of the Consumers' Foundation. With 900 passengers on a fully-loaded train casualties could be `very heavy' he believes.
Arthur Chiang, a vice-president of Taiwain [sic] High Speed Rail, acknowledged that the project had been bedevilled by opposition, but insisted that it was completely safe."
Golly.
And there I was praising the Independent article, when in fact the good stuff was all written by the New York Times' Keith Bradsher and then tweaked a little. The only bit of substance that the reporter wrote was the lead that included two howlers!
I e-mailed the foreign desk and then the news desk of the Independent about the report by Barrie Clement -- the paper's transport editor -- and received no reply, even after suggesting that there was inappropriate use of another newspaper's property. Make of that what you will.
Either way, it seems a little disrespectful toward readers to plagiarize a New York Times article and write in mistakes misidentifying Taiwan and Japan.
If this kind of reporting continues at the Independent, perhaps they'll need to redub themselves the Dependent.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs