Last week, hot on the heels of the New Year celebrations, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma's comments are good news for Taiwan, where the opposing political camps have brought the country's politics to a standstill.
Similar sentiments were expressed by former premier Frank Hsieh (
Though the KMT has often been criticized for suppressing dissent, it and its chairman no longer stand for the authoritarianism of old. In fact, the party has been allowed to split into various factions. KMT legislators make forceful statements and in some cases even demonstrate more decisiveness than their chairman.
These legislators have been labeled hawkish by the media. Their actions often run counter to Ma's statements. To name a few examples, KMT legislators have blocked the arms procurement budget close to 70 times. They have attempted to impede the president's right to nominate members of the Control Yuan and forced through the creation of the 319 Shooting Truth Investigation Commission and the National Communications Commission, based on an unconstitutional principle of proportional representation.
These measures clearly undermine national security and the fundamental democratic concept of the division of power. That is why many believe the KMT has been hijacked by the party's hawkish faction.
Oftentimes, the legislature will spend a whole day treading water because one or two of the KMT's more hawkish legislators remain obdurate in their views. On some occasions, thanks to their antics and conduct unbecoming, they have managed to turn the process into a zoo.
Most legislators have high expectations of themselves, for those who choose a career in politics do so with the intent to serve the public, improve the quality of life of the nation's citizens and ameliorate the functioning of democratic institutions. As a responsible opposition party, the KMT should initiate cooperation with the DPP rather than use controversial bills as a means to block non-controversial ones.
It does not really matter that the KMT refuses to accept the concept of transitional justice proposed by the DPP. But it should at least seek to reach a consensus with the DPP on the development of a just society by strengthening, for example, the social security system, improving gender equality and building a pluralistic society.
Ma's decision to revise the KMT position could indicate an intent to make the KMT a responsible opposition party in preparation for the presidential election.
If the two parties truly desire cooperation, they should start in the legislature. The top priority should be to stop the use of controversial issues to interfere with routine ones and persuade hawkish KMT legislators to stop their obstructionism.
Inherent to a democratic system is competition and opposition between political parties. But by no means does this mean that debate should have a negative impact on the nation's future.
As we all hope for a prosperous Taiwan, we can hope that this attempt at reconciliation will be an true and successful one.
Chen Chi-yu is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations