The amendments to the Statute Governing the Reconstruction of Weathered Military Communities (
One of the amendments, whose first reading was passed on Tuesday, makes it a requirement for contractors involved in government-led urban renewal projects in military communities to compensate residents affected by the work -- even in cases where houses were built without a permit.
The legislature also passed a first reading of an amendment proposed by KMT legislators Chu Fong-chi (
If that bill were to make it to a second and third reading, it could impose a ridiculous financial burden on the government, somewhere in the region of NT$1.3 trillion.
Taiwanese work hard to earn their wages yet decades later are still paying back mortgage and bank loans.
Contrast this with residents in military residential compounds set up to house soldiers and family members who came to Taiwan with Chiang Kai-shek's (
Since 1972, the group has been well taken care of by the ministry. In order to look after military personnel and their dependents, the government promulgated the Operational Guidelines for the Reconstruction of Weathered Military Communities.
Under the guidelines, households in veterans' villages located on state-owned land were given a 70 percent government subsidy for the purchase of new housing -- amounting to practically free housing in Taipei and other areas.
Over the years, the group continued to enjoy quasi-free housing purchased by the government, in addition to monthly subsidies. And these benefits carry over from generation to generation.
Veterans made a contribution of sorts to the nation and are more or less entitled to the NT$13,550, if not more, monthly subsidy that they receive.
But aren't farmers -- who only receive NT$5,000 a month -- contributing just as much to the nation?
The government has given too much to this group, to the extent that over time it has become detrimental to other groups.
Many aging farmers, fishermen and laborers have had far worse living conditions and financial burdens than their military counterparts. The government hasn't purchased houses for, or given housing subsidies to, any of these people.
The Democratic Progressive Party cannot call itself a party that stands for social justice if it stands by while bills are passed by the pan-blue camp that pander to the interests of a specific group.
If legislators really care for the wellbeing of veterans, they should strive to find better ways of ameliorating the retired soldiers' lot than playing around with real estate.
The government should stand up to unfair legislation to ensure that distribution of welfare is not brought into disrepute.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry