On Christmas eve, the Maltese freighter Tzini ran aground off Suao (
The media portrayed this as a repeat of the notorious Amorgos incident, when the ship Amorgos ran aground off the coast of the Lungken Conservation Area in Kenting National Park on Jan. 14, 2001.
This repeat brings some frightening facts into focus. The social conditions that allowed the Amorgos catastrophe to happen five years ago remain largely unchanged today. That oil spill seems to have taught us nothing about preventing future oil spills. As the people of a maritime state, how can we not take this issue more seriously?
The latest oil spill and the 2001 spill both occurred around big holidays, so reports and reactions to them were slow.
Also, since they both occurred in remote areas, the spread of news was delayed. The Christmas celebrations and commercial and political events are clearly hard news to compete with, even for oil spills significantly affecting Taiwan's marine ecology. Even without the holidays, media report only briefly on such cases.
The Amorgos spill occurred six years ago, but studies at Kenting National Park reveal that the ecological systems, and coral reefs in particular, have not yet recovered. Experts cannot even begin to say how long the recovery is going to take.
Unfortunately for us all, the authorities haven't taken action to prevent this kind of spill, even in the face of large-scale environmental damage.
Many projects are more challenging and risky at sea than on land. This is why the world's maritime states must have higher standards when handling marine matters.
But in Taiwan, which has a leading role in the world in terms of its fishery industry and sea transportation, such matters are undervalued by both the government and the public.
After the Amorgos spill, although the government filed a lawsuit against the ship's owner and demanded compensation, the inability to calculate the amount of compensation required and to successfully proceed with an international lawsuit highlighted how far Taiwan had to go before becoming a leading maritime state.
Laughably, a Norwegian court ruled that the ship's owner pay NT$9.53 million (US$294,000), while Taiwan's legal fees alone were NT$16.7. million.
Our government must be able to handle such marine disputes.
Over the past few years, politicians have repeatedly used phrases such as "maritime city" or "maritime state" in their campaigns to attract voters, but Taiwan's progress in maritime affairs remains limited.
Take the Cabinet's restructure plan, for example. The proposed marine affairs ministry that would have stressed Taiwan's ambition to become a true marine state was quickly sacrificed in political power struggles.
The status of the proposed marine affairs committee under the Coast Guard Administration suffered a similar fate. It was downgraded from an agency with real powers to a cross-ministerial negotiation unit. It will probably exist only nominally in future Cabinets, as the government has lost its determination and ambition to focus on maritime affairs.
As the Tzini spill is a repetition of 2001, it is painfully clear how forgetful people are. If we learn nothing from these disasters, Taiwan's dream of becoming a real maritime state will never be realized.
Chen Tai-an is a lecturer in the department of environmental resources management at the Transworld Institute of Technology.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations