At a news conference yesterday as a show of moral support for Prosecutor Chang Hsi-huai (
The news conference came as a sudden reminder that the campaign to depose Chen still exists after a period of inaction.
It was an effective reminder. It brought back the memory of how absurd and hypocritical the group driving the campaign is.
Chang, who has been under fire from DPP legislators over alleged pro-China sentiment, reportedly broke down on Tuesday night, shouting and yelling randomly in his office in front of colleagues.
The anti-Chen campaign, under the leadership of former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh (
The campaign leaders seem blissfully unaware that they have set a prime example of disrespect for the law. Shih has steered his red-clad supporters to ignore the Assembly and Parade Law (
In addition, Shih also pressured the Judicial Yuan by claiming he would lead demonstrators to surround its premises if it did not indict Chen.
A more pressing issue than the campaign's criticism of so-called "Green Terror" was the use of its funds, which have still not been accounted for.
When Shih initiated the campaign in August this year, he said his main motive was to fight corruption. Under the anti-corruption banner, Shih accused Chen of corruption and called for him to be ousted.
With that appeal, he started a fundraising campaign, urging the public to donate NT$100 each to show their support for an anti-corruption movement. A total of NT$111 million (US$3.36 million) in donations was received.
Strangely enough, this so-called anti-corruption campaign hasn't actively supported the recall of Keelung Mayor Hsu Tsai-li (
The Keelung District Court on Sept. 19 sentenced Hsu to seven years in prison and stripped him of his civil rights for eight years after his sentence ends. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) subsequently expelled him from the party.
Shih said earlier this month that he would stay in isolation until Chen steps down.
If Shih wants to spend his time indoors, he'll be fine. After all, the 165m2 apartment where the anti-Chen campaign has camped out -- possibly paid for by some of those funds the group hasn't accounted for -- should be roomy enough.
But what about his anti-corruption pledge to his supporters? What about the money people donated believing that it would be used against corruption?
The last time the campaign publicized its financial records, it reported that a total of NT$62 million had been spent as of Oct. 11. Another NT$48.82 million remained in the campaign's account.
Two months have since passed without news on expenses and the current state of the account.
It is time for those who donated their NT$100 to end their blind faith in the anti-Chen campaign and ask what the funds have been used for.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with