Serbia -- long castigated as the land whose late president, Slobodan Milosevic, launched a genocide in Yugoslavia -- is not accustomed to finding itself lauded for safeguarding human rights. But in one area of human rights protection, the much-maligned Serbia has taken an unprecedented step that puts it ahead of all the rest of Central and Eastern Europe, including states already in the EU.
In September, Serbia's Ministry of Labor, Education and Social Affairs made it official policy to integrate into society thousands of people who had been locked away in Dickensian state institutions because they have a mental disability.
With this historic move, Serbia adopted a practice that took hold in the rich, Western countries after World War II but was never applied in the communist bloc.
It is anathema to the concept of a free society to segregate people solely on the basis of mental disability, to ignore their most basic human rights, to bar them from access to education and employment, to deny them the freedom to choose where and how they live and with whom they can associate.
The policy change aimed at rectifying this grim reality in Serbia came when the ministry agreed to apply a pilot project nationwide that has, since 2003, established a range of community-based support services to enable persons with intellectual disabilities to leave the institutions where they were confined and begin living in the wider world. That pilot project demonstrated that people with mental disabilities are capable of living as equal citizens when they receive appropriate assistance.
Based upon the project's success, the ministry has committed to purchasing more than 130 apartments and homes to house people brought out of institutions and to establish services to help them cope with the complexities of life beyond the walls that once confined them. Funding for the reforms comes from the privatization of state assets -- not from aid from abroad. To Serbia's credit, the ministry made the decision knowing that the change would require belt-tightening elsewhere, but it took action because it concluded that protecting human rights was more important than saving a few dinars.
Hopefully, Serbia's decision will inspire the other states of Central and Eastern Europe, including states that have won membership in the EU, to follow its lead. It is shocking that the EU has done so little to press its members and prospective members to promote community living for people with mental disabilities.
None of the new EU member-states has concrete plans or financing mechanisms to develop networks of community-based alternatives on a national scale. While there are pockets of high-quality, community-based services in most of the region's countries, tens of thousands of people with mental disabilities are still living in institutions, and most of them have no prospect of ever leaving.
Hungary continues to segregate its most disabled citizens and spend millions of dollars on the construction of a new institutional behemoth which sits empty because it does not meet EU fire and safety standards.
Croatia is demonstrating that deinstitutionalization is not a question of money. The Open Society Institute committed over US$2 million to assist the government in closing a large institution for people with intellectual disabilities. But, almost a year into the negotiations, the government is still not ready to commit to concrete action.
In Romania last year, children were dying of starvation in one institution. The government placed the blame on local authorities; the local authorities blamed the government for allocating inadequate resources; and inmates of the institutions still look out at the world through windows that are locked and barred.
There is an urgent need to change government policies so that providing services for people with mental disabilities in the community is the norm rather than the exception. Such services must be accessible to everyone who needs them. And governments must reallocate resources from institutions -- and the bureaucracies that have a vested interest in preserving their positions -- to organizations that support community-based living.
It is time for the rest of Central and Eastern Europe to catch up to Serbia.
Dragan Lukic is director of a community-based housing project in Serbia. Judith Klein is director of the Open Society Mental Health Initiative.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under