Serbia -- long castigated as the land whose late president, Slobodan Milosevic, launched a genocide in Yugoslavia -- is not accustomed to finding itself lauded for safeguarding human rights. But in one area of human rights protection, the much-maligned Serbia has taken an unprecedented step that puts it ahead of all the rest of Central and Eastern Europe, including states already in the EU.
In September, Serbia's Ministry of Labor, Education and Social Affairs made it official policy to integrate into society thousands of people who had been locked away in Dickensian state institutions because they have a mental disability.
With this historic move, Serbia adopted a practice that took hold in the rich, Western countries after World War II but was never applied in the communist bloc.
It is anathema to the concept of a free society to segregate people solely on the basis of mental disability, to ignore their most basic human rights, to bar them from access to education and employment, to deny them the freedom to choose where and how they live and with whom they can associate.
The policy change aimed at rectifying this grim reality in Serbia came when the ministry agreed to apply a pilot project nationwide that has, since 2003, established a range of community-based support services to enable persons with intellectual disabilities to leave the institutions where they were confined and begin living in the wider world. That pilot project demonstrated that people with mental disabilities are capable of living as equal citizens when they receive appropriate assistance.
Based upon the project's success, the ministry has committed to purchasing more than 130 apartments and homes to house people brought out of institutions and to establish services to help them cope with the complexities of life beyond the walls that once confined them. Funding for the reforms comes from the privatization of state assets -- not from aid from abroad. To Serbia's credit, the ministry made the decision knowing that the change would require belt-tightening elsewhere, but it took action because it concluded that protecting human rights was more important than saving a few dinars.
Hopefully, Serbia's decision will inspire the other states of Central and Eastern Europe, including states that have won membership in the EU, to follow its lead. It is shocking that the EU has done so little to press its members and prospective members to promote community living for people with mental disabilities.
None of the new EU member-states has concrete plans or financing mechanisms to develop networks of community-based alternatives on a national scale. While there are pockets of high-quality, community-based services in most of the region's countries, tens of thousands of people with mental disabilities are still living in institutions, and most of them have no prospect of ever leaving.
Hungary continues to segregate its most disabled citizens and spend millions of dollars on the construction of a new institutional behemoth which sits empty because it does not meet EU fire and safety standards.
Croatia is demonstrating that deinstitutionalization is not a question of money. The Open Society Institute committed over US$2 million to assist the government in closing a large institution for people with intellectual disabilities. But, almost a year into the negotiations, the government is still not ready to commit to concrete action.
In Romania last year, children were dying of starvation in one institution. The government placed the blame on local authorities; the local authorities blamed the government for allocating inadequate resources; and inmates of the institutions still look out at the world through windows that are locked and barred.
There is an urgent need to change government policies so that providing services for people with mental disabilities in the community is the norm rather than the exception. Such services must be accessible to everyone who needs them. And governments must reallocate resources from institutions -- and the bureaucracies that have a vested interest in preserving their positions -- to organizations that support community-based living.
It is time for the rest of Central and Eastern Europe to catch up to Serbia.
Dragan Lukic is director of a community-based housing project in Serbia. Judith Klein is director of the Open Society Mental Health Initiative.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry