Mon, Dec 25, 2006 - Page 9 News List

The curse of unilateralism

Does the disappointment of Iraq -- and the related current crisis of US consciousness -- mark the decline of the US or, let us hope, the beginning of a return to multilateralism

By Joschka Fischer

he realization in the US that the war in Iraq has been lost is perhaps the most momentous fact of international politics this year. The time of US unilateralism is objectively over. Whether US foreign policy will come to reflect this fact, only the future will tell.

Unfortunately, this also means that a unique opportunity has been lost. For only the US -- with all its power and sense of mission -- had the ability to establish a new world order at the beginning of the twenty-first century. To achieve this, the US would have had to subordinate its power to the goal of shaping the new order, much as it did at the close of World War II in 1945. Instead, the US succumbed to the temptation of unilateralism.

National greatness for a world power always arises from its ability to shape the world. If a great power forgets this, or loses the ability to act accordingly, it begins to decline. It is almost tempting to think that the US' great Cold War opponent, the Soviet Union, with its sudden disappearance 15 years ago this month, left its own Trojan horse for the US -- the poisoned gift of unilateralism.

Without a fundamental turnaround in the US political consciousness, the unilateralist amnesia of US foreign policy will have far-reaching consequences and leave a huge vacuum in the global system. No other nation -- not China, Europe, India or Russia -- has the power and the sense of mission to take on the US' role. Only the US was (and potentially still is) able to fuse realism and idealism, self-interest and ethics, in its foreign policy.

Only the US pursued a foreign policy that conceived freedom and democracy as its mission. This was not always and everywhere the case -- certainly not in Latin America. But where it did apply, the US' strength and willingness to seek international cooperation created an order whose institutions still hold the world together.

The UN, NATO, the IMF and the World Bank, the law of nations and international criminal law, even today's free and united Europe -- all are crowning achievements of US foreign policy. They mark the moments in history when the US' power was used to further a global order, while also pursuing its own interests in the most effective and sustainable manner.

The US' departure from this great tradition did not begin with the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Indeed, as early as the final years of the Cold War, the US began to view the whole system of international treaties and institutions as an obstacle to enforcing its own interests. The US' foreign policy elite increasingly came to perceive the US as a Gulliver tied down and oppressed by political midgets, with their laws of nations, treaties, and multilateral institutions. The existing world order -- created by the US itself -- was first devalued in American eyes, then weakened and finally consciously attacked.

Thus, the current debate in the US about the consequences of defeat in Iraq still falls short -- because, despite all the critiques of US policy, that debate is still premised on the unilateral use of US power. This applies to the views of the Democratic opposition as well as to the Baker-Hamilton report.

What is needed is a conscious, deliberate return of US foreign policy to multilateralism. This mental turnaround is, indeed, essential if things are to improve, because the situation in Iraq represents, above all, a defeat of the US' unilateralist orientation.

This story has been viewed 3026 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top