A PUBLIC consensus was reached in support of reforming the 18 percent preferential savings interest rate for military personnel, civil servants and teachers.
The initiative was supported by the National Teachers' Association (
But certain university teachers' associations opposed the reform because of their low salaries.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) caucuses then dropped out of the negotiations, putting this hard-fought opportunity for reform at risk.
There are two reasons that I support going ahead with the reform.
To begin with, the 18 percent system for civil servants and teachers is the product of a time when these groups had much lower salaries.
Putting it another way, this system and its pecularities are the end result of specific historical circumstances.
Today, however, their salaries are no longer that low when compared with those of laborers and farmers.
Furthermore, when the system was established, bank interest rates were still high, and the 18 percent system did not seem unacceptable in the eyes of the public.
Today, however, bank interest rates are close to zero, and this makes the 18 percent preferential interest rate seem astronomical in the eyes of many.
It therefore comes as no surprise that some people regard the system as a special privilege and an intolerable one at that.
Furthermore, the existence of the 18 percent system has led to a lack of transparency in our general mechanism for compensation, which readily incites jealousy between social classes. The fact that some teachers receive more money after retirement than they did before angers many people on lower incomes.
I once heard someone complain that no matter how hard he worked, he still only earned half of what a retired teacher gets.
He said he wouldn't complain that he was making less than others who were working, but he could not accept that some people would make so much after retiring.
He blasted the government for not taking better care of the poor.
It could be argued that the salaries of college teachers are a bit on the low side.
But the issue must be tackled by adjusting salary structures, rather than through this outdated 18 percent system.
This kind of opaque system only aggravates feelings of social inequality and deepens social divisions.
The KMT has always come across as a party ultimately oriented to the middle classes, and it is not very sensitive to the interests of laborers and farmers.
Its opposition to the 18 percent reform once again reveals the party's middle class bias. This is regrettable.
I also want to express my respect for the National Teachers Association.
While responsible for voicing the concerns of the nation's teachers, the association has tackled reform of the 18 percent system from the wider perspective of what is in the best interests of the greater community.
This sets a good example for all teachers and is worthy of our respect.
Lii Ding-tzann is a professor in the Graduate School of sociology at National Tsing-hua University.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose