The factors determining electoral victory and defeat are complicated. Even so, different parties and even well-known political scientists habitually oversimplify the post-election debate and specify the bare minimum they need to make their point.
Wu Yu-shan (
More concretely, Wu said that "the pro-localization stance of most voters in southern Taiwan means that they are willing to give the Democratic Progressive Party [DPP] a chance while they remain wary of the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT]."
Wu added that holding fast to ideological positions in southern Taiwan means that the die-hard loyalist vote will always remain.
But Wu also said that "the pan-blue camp has fewer ideologically driven voters in northern Taiwan. Therefore, it has to highlight its past performances to win voters ... Nor should the pan-green camp think it can use its pro-localization ideology to influence northerners prone to criticizing those in power."
These arguments are unconsciously colored by northerners' prejudice towards residents of southern Taiwan. If we agree that the north could vote for either the pan-green or the pan-blue camp and that northerners are "prone to criticizing those in power," then that means that the individual candidate is more important than anything else and that there is no "structure" underlying why the north is blue and the south green.
In what way is Frank Hsieh (
But the KMT's victory in the recent mayoral elections was not complete, and the DPP's defeat was not complete. Driven by Hsieh's mayoral bid, the number of pan-green Taipei city councilors increased by three seats. In Kaohsiung, 17 of 18 KMT city council candidates were elected with 35.95 percent of the vote, a much better showing than the DPP, which only secured 15 seats and 30.49 percent of the vote. This shows that the green-blue political structure is not so solid. In addition, Chen Chu (陳菊) defeated Huang Chun-ying (黃俊英) by a razor-thin margin, more like an equally shared vote.
To increase the crisis awareness among voters, both the KMT and the DPP went overboard in their descriptions of what defeat would mean. In fact, both sides have serious internal problems to solve. If victory and complacency mean that they will lose a great opportunity to reform, they will be planting the seeds of future failure.
As a result of tactical voting in the mayoral elections, the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and People First Party (PFP) also fared poorly in the city council elections. Maybe, however, neither the DPP's policies nor the KMT's performance strictly adhere to the ideology of the pan-green or pan-blue camps. In addition, there are class and environmental issues transcending the camp framework.
If the smaller parties can build a firm foundation for themselves and gather enough talent, there may still be a place for them after next year's legislative elections.
Chen Yi-shen is a researcher at Academia Sinica's Institute of Modern History.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under