Fed up with government inaction on the hot-button issue of illegal immigration, a growing number of US towns are taking matters into their own hands adopting controversial and, some say, illegal legislation.
From making English the official language of local government to banning foreign flags, more than 30 cities or municipalities across the country in recent months have adopted measures designed to be anti-immigrant.
Laws
Many have also passed laws banning landlords from renting to undocumented immigrants and penalizing local businesses that hire illegals.
Observers say such measures reflect a growing sense of frustration with the federal government's ongoing debate on how to deal with the country's estimated 11 million illegal immigrants, most of them from Mexico and Central America.
"In most cases, these local changes to the law or ordinances that are trying to be passed represent communities first of all dealing with an influx of immigration," Audrey Singer, an expert on immigration trends with the Brookings Institution, an independent Washington think tank, said.
"Secondly the leadership in those places are frustrated by the federal government and so they are taking immigration law in their own hands," she said.
Nationwide
Singer also noted that whereas 10 years ago the issue of illegal immigration involved only a few states, it has now become a nationwide concern as immigrants, mostly Hispanics, have spread across the country.
"The newness of the phenomenon and, in some cases, the growth has been very fast," Singer said. "So local leadership in some cases embrace immigrants and accommodate them and in some cases work toward deflecting them elsewhere."
Flags
In Pahrump, a desert outpost in the western state of Nevada with a growing immigrant population, the local council last month voted an English-only ordinance along with a measure barring residents from flying a foreign flag unless it is placed below an American flag. Violators face a US$50 fine and 30 hours of community service.
In Hazleton, an industrial city in the northeast state of Pennsylvania, local authorities justified the adoption of a tough anti-immigrant ordinance by arguing that illegals contribute to an increase in crime and failing schools, and are a burden to the city's resources.
Racism
Rob Toonkel, spokeswoman for US English, a group that promotes the use of the English language in government that has helped several towns draw up ordinances to that effect, said such measures have nothing to do with racism.
"Official English legislation as written has nothing to do with criticizing immigrants in any way," Toonkel said. "What it says is `you can't walk into a government office and demand service in a language other than English.'"
But critics fear such measures will eventually lead to a general backlash against legal immigrants or anyone who looks different or even speaks with an accent.
Discrimination
"They almost represent kind of a green light for discrimination against immigrants generally and against US citizens who may appear to be foreign," Omar Jadwat said.
Jadwat is an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, which has filed lawsuits against the ordinances in many cities, including Hazleton, on grounds they are unconstitutional.
"The practicalities of how these ordinances work tend to encourage people to discriminate generally against folks who look foreign regardless of their immigration status," Jadwat said.
Reaction
William Ramos, director of the Washington office of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials, said the measures which are designed to be anti-immigrant are more a knee-jerk reaction than a thoughtful response to community problems.
"Whichever it is, I certainly hope that folks can be enlightened quickly enough to understand that these 11 million Latinos who are undocumented are not necessarily going anywhere, anytime soon," he said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry