The electorate has spoken and the results of the elections held over the weekend are clear: voters' wisdom tells them that at this stage "maintaining the status quo" is the best option for Taiwanese politics. People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) dropped another bombshell while the votes were still being counted when he announced that he would be retiring from politics.
This could spell the rapid demise of the PFP and symbolize the fortification of a two-party structure. The political implications of this battle clearly surpass just who the local leaders are and will have far-reaching consequences for future political development.
One question worth pursuing is the role that the media plays in Taiwan's democracy.
We all know that Taiwan's democratization accompanied the liberalization and commercialization of the media. At the beginning, everyone hoped that the media would enter into an era of normal competition and bid farewell to the role they played under the authoritarian system, when they were merely mouthpieces for the ruling elite's propaganda.
People hoped the media would become a real "fourth estate," establish a firm foundation for the public sector and honestly reflect public opinion.
However, things have not turned out as expected. On the one hand, Taiwan's media environment has certainly advanced by leaps and bounds. All kinds of new broadcasting technology -- such as cable TV, the Internet and digital information -- have empowered the media with an unprecedented reach, allowing them to instantaneously report news happening in all corners of the globe.
But the small nation of Taiwan has suddenly been overrun with the highest concentration of satellite news gathering trucks in the world, symbolizing that media competition has gone beyond white hot and has even become detrimental.
What's worse, certain media outlets have used talking heads as a tool for political manipulation. This is a complete departure from the standard set by media professionalism and brings down the quality of our democracy.
Taiwan was part of the world's "third wave" of democratization, but various systems essential to democracy still remain unfinished.
With the Constitution yet to be rewritten, our political culture not fully mature and political opposition growing more vehement, the media should bear a greater responsibility for educating people and making an example of themselves to help realize a civil society.
Unfortunately, some of the media just seem bent on their ratings, and even intentionally cater to the biases of extremists. They have ignored the sacred duty to spread the truth and encourage rational discussion and have instead become pawns of self-interested politicians in their proxy wars.
Taiwan's democracy has been afflicted by the "curse of the media," including its efforts to encourage protesters to force national leaders out of office. In the end, this resort to populism backfired, leading to aversion.
The election results are proof of this. This indicates that voters aren't willing to play along with the media's tricks, choosing instead to assert their will through their political choices, thereby strengthening Taiwan's democracy.
Some pundits had said that the elections would be a "vote of confidence" in the president; instead, it is media organizations that have received a vote of no confidence.
So while the elections will prompt the various political parties to take a step back and reflect, Taiwan's biased media outlets should certainly do the same.
Ku Chung-hwa is a professor in the department of sociology at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Marc Langer
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with