The electorate has spoken and the results of the elections held over the weekend are clear: voters' wisdom tells them that at this stage "maintaining the status quo" is the best option for Taiwanese politics. People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) dropped another bombshell while the votes were still being counted when he announced that he would be retiring from politics.
This could spell the rapid demise of the PFP and symbolize the fortification of a two-party structure. The political implications of this battle clearly surpass just who the local leaders are and will have far-reaching consequences for future political development.
One question worth pursuing is the role that the media plays in Taiwan's democracy.
We all know that Taiwan's democratization accompanied the liberalization and commercialization of the media. At the beginning, everyone hoped that the media would enter into an era of normal competition and bid farewell to the role they played under the authoritarian system, when they were merely mouthpieces for the ruling elite's propaganda.
People hoped the media would become a real "fourth estate," establish a firm foundation for the public sector and honestly reflect public opinion.
However, things have not turned out as expected. On the one hand, Taiwan's media environment has certainly advanced by leaps and bounds. All kinds of new broadcasting technology -- such as cable TV, the Internet and digital information -- have empowered the media with an unprecedented reach, allowing them to instantaneously report news happening in all corners of the globe.
But the small nation of Taiwan has suddenly been overrun with the highest concentration of satellite news gathering trucks in the world, symbolizing that media competition has gone beyond white hot and has even become detrimental.
What's worse, certain media outlets have used talking heads as a tool for political manipulation. This is a complete departure from the standard set by media professionalism and brings down the quality of our democracy.
Taiwan was part of the world's "third wave" of democratization, but various systems essential to democracy still remain unfinished.
With the Constitution yet to be rewritten, our political culture not fully mature and political opposition growing more vehement, the media should bear a greater responsibility for educating people and making an example of themselves to help realize a civil society.
Unfortunately, some of the media just seem bent on their ratings, and even intentionally cater to the biases of extremists. They have ignored the sacred duty to spread the truth and encourage rational discussion and have instead become pawns of self-interested politicians in their proxy wars.
Taiwan's democracy has been afflicted by the "curse of the media," including its efforts to encourage protesters to force national leaders out of office. In the end, this resort to populism backfired, leading to aversion.
The election results are proof of this. This indicates that voters aren't willing to play along with the media's tricks, choosing instead to assert their will through their political choices, thereby strengthening Taiwan's democracy.
Some pundits had said that the elections would be a "vote of confidence" in the president; instead, it is media organizations that have received a vote of no confidence.
So while the elections will prompt the various political parties to take a step back and reflect, Taiwan's biased media outlets should certainly do the same.
Ku Chung-hwa is a professor in the department of sociology at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Marc Langer
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations