Question: If you are the citizen of a nation that is free and independent, how does it benefit you to agitate over semantics, when the agitation itself endangers your freedom and independence?
This is the fundamental problem that vocal Taiwanese independence activists rarely address.
In a perfect world, you could call a spade a spade and Taiwan would be recognized as the independent, sovereign state that it is. Everyone, including the humorless stiffs in Beijing, would be happy, and we could all go skipping away hand-in-hand into the sunset, with a rainbow overhead and surrounded by a field full of flowers, replete with giggling fat infants playing with puppy dogs.
But we live in the real world. China is a scary, unpredictable place whose leaders care as much -- if not more -- about saving face than they do about improving the lives of their people. They spend billions of dollars on unnecessary weapons with one purpose in mind: becoming a world power. Beijing wants to save face -- China having been a loser for the past 167 years -- on a global scale.
Meanwhile, Taiwan is pretty well off as it is. People here are free to make their own choices and improve their system of government. The country may not be paradise, but people live much better here than they do in China. So Taiwanese can sit back and watch while the Chinese government evolves or dissolves.
But into this reality a fool on a fool's errand intrudes.
The Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA), an influential pro-independence lobby in the US, has announced that it is starting a campaign to make the directors of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) -- the de facto US embassy -- go through confirmation hearings in the US Senate.
To examine this idea, we must set aside reality, after elucidating what that reality is: FAPA's campaign has no chance of success.
The association would have us believe that the "new" Congress is somehow different in its attitude toward Taiwan than the "old" Congress. There is, of course, no evidence to support this conclusion, given that support for Taiwan has never been a partisan issue in the US.
The people who support Taiwan support Taiwan, whether they are Democrats or Republicans. However, very few people support changing Taiwan's status in any meaningful way, because it is just too provocative.
Even in Taiwan very few people support such moves. As US president Dwight Eisenhower once said about another group of delusional activists: "Their numbers are negligible, and they are stupid."
But let us stretch our imaginations to the breaking point and assume that FAPA's imprudent campaign actually had a chance of succeeding. How would it benefit Taiwan?
The short answer is: It wouldn't.
If the AIT director had to go through a Senate confirmation hearing, he would enjoy all of the prestige and glory that comes with having one's personal history ripped to shreds for partisan blood sport, as "real" ambassadors do. How wonderful.
More to the point, it would also mean that the pro-China lobby would have a voice in determining who conducted diplomacy with Taiwan. How does that help anyone?
Taiwan is pretty lucky to have a real diplomat -- AIT Director Stephen Young -- as it is. Most countries get saddled with political cronies whose qualifications are determined by how much money they donated to the US president's campaign fund.
Taiwan gains nothing by appearing to be the one who is destabilizing the situation. This country's power and influence come from holding the moral high ground, not undermining it.
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
On Thursday last week, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a barnstorming speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, California, titled “Communist China and the Free World’s Future.” The speech set out in no uncertain terms the insoluble ideological divide between a totalitarian, communist China and the democratic, free-market values of the US. It was also a full-throated call to arms for all nations of the free world to rally behind the US and defeat China. Pompeo elaborated on a clear distinction between China and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in an attempt to recalibrate the
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more