As China's five-year adjustment period since accession to the WTO draws to a close, the US and Europe are intensifying pressure for the emerging giant to play fair by the rules of global trade.
But the rhetoric is also a vindication of China's entry into the WTO, which has given trading partners a forum to vent their grievances and a chance to prise open the world's most populous market.
Grant Aldonas had a ringside seat to observe China's accession to the Geneva-based club, as US undersecretary of commerce for international trade from 2001 to last year and before that as a top trade lawyer in Congress.
"Although there are difficulties in the US-China relationship, the bet that members of Congress were making was that the power of markets would expand the range of freedom in China," he said.
"As far as I'm concerned, when I go to China these days, that bet has been vindicated," said Aldonas, who is now a senior fellow at Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Cheap Chinese goods have kept US interest rates low and so fostered a five-year expansion in the world's biggest economy, the former US official said.
China's entry into the WTO on Dec. 11, 2001, was welcomed by its trading partners as finally bringing one of the world's fastest-growing economies into the bosom of the trading system.
China became subject to the binding regulations governing world commerce -- but enjoyed a five-year transition period before some of the rules were applied fully.
With that period coming to an end, both the US and EU have warned that China can expect harsher scrutiny of the access it gives to foreign companies and the protection it affords to intellectual property.
US Trade Representative Susan Schwab, who now faces a potentially hostile Congress controlled by Democrats, said last week that she was "looking seriously at additional cases unless China fulfills its WTO commitments."
Last month, EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson issued a similar warning.
"China has reached a stage in its development when the rest of the world is entitled to ask for more from China," he said.
John Jackson, a professor of international economic law at Georgetown University, said nobody expected China's WTO membership to be smooth sailing.
"But I think if I were to give a broad-brush evaluation of how it's gone so far, I'd put it well above a `B,'" said Jackson, who sits on WTO arbitration panels tasked with mediating over trade disputes.
"On the whole it's been quite good. Some of the catastrophes that some people predicted have not happened. There hasn't been a whole rash of cases," he said.
The EU has led WTO members in imposing anti-dumping duties on Chinese products, including shoes and textiles. One high-profile dispute over clothing imports sparked the so-called "bra wars" with China.
Along with Canada, the US and EU have sued China in a dispute over car parts. That has become the first row involving China to reach the WTO arbitration stage.
But Jackson said that such disputes were par for the course.
"It's clearly good for the system. The WTO could not have lasted much longer without China on board," he said.
However, nothing irks the US and EU more than rampant violations in China of their intellectual property, which pundits say is shaping up to be the next big clash at the WTO.
"The accession agreement has been a failure," University of Maryland business professor Peter Morici argued.
"China's presence in the WTO, coupled with its currency, foreign investment, and other industrial policies, is undermining the WTO system," he warned.
"Ultimately, the WTO could collapse under the weight of Chinese mercantilism," he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with