I am a Canadian and have been driving in Canada and Taiwan for more than 13 years. I would like to comment on Wang Wen-chen's (
I agree with Wang that creating a civil society is the key to safer freeways. I would also like to make a suggestion to help create a society that places greater emphasis on morals and values.
During my five years in Taiwan, I've had the "pleasure" of accompanying many Taiwanese drivers. It's always an experience. I keep thinking to myself as they swerve in and out of traffic or drive like a grandmother: "What the hell are they doing?" or "Am I going to die?"
Out of curiosity, I have asked my friends about their driving exam and the process for getting a license here.
They all tell me practically the same thing: they went to a driving school for one month and practiced on a driving course just like the one the driving test is held on at the Ministry of Transportation. At the schools they received just two hours of driving time on the road.
This amazes me, because it tells me that they just learned how to pass the driving test without really learning any driving or road safety skills. They didn't learn to tell the difference between correct and incorrect driving behavior or how to act on the road during critical situations.
In Canada, I first had to take a written test to get my learner's permit and then I went to the Young Drivers of Canada driving school.
Before I ever got behind the wheel I spent time in a classroom learning the theory and morality of driving a car, learning to think about the other drivers on the road and learning the consequences of my actions.
This class lasted for around 15 to 20 hours, with a written test afterwards.
After the class, I spent another 20 to 25 hours driving a car on the roads and freeways with a skilled instructor who helped me put into practice the skills I learned in class.
For example, he taught me things such as how to use an on-ramp to enter the freeway: you accelerate your vehicle to the speed of traffic and then merge in. You do this because it does not cause other drivers to stop abruptly or swerve to change lanes, which could lead to a fatal accident.
Those who know of Young Drivers of Canada know that it is one of the more expensive driving schools in the country, but those who attend are offered less expensive insurance rates than those who don't.
In Taiwanese society, which places such high value on educating the young, I think the average family would want their sons or daughters to be taught the best skills possible, whether on or off the road.
I believe it would be an excellent idea for the nation's insurance companies to get together with the driving schools and parents to offer quality instruction to young drivers.
By doing this, we will see the development of a civil society with better morals, values and good driving skills.
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his