As China moves to complete its 50-year program to eradicate the Tibetan people, it has become clear that the UN is guilty of allowing genocide to occur there. Never has there been a more persistent and ludicrous example of the UN's utter failure to do anything other than talk.
The Tibet we see today comes courtesy of the endless debate the UN started in 1959 over whether Tibet had anything to fear from the Chinese.
Typical of the impotence and uselessness of the UN, the obvious answer to the question -- 50 years later -- is "yes, and it's too late, stupid."
How many deaths will it take until the UN knows that too many people have died? In the Middle East, the deaths of Palestinians merits a proclamation by the UN's Human Rights Commissioner against Israel.
Yet the death toll in Tibet far exceeds 1 million, and the careful, patient and determined plan of the Chinese government to exterminate the Tibetans has been mostly successful. How, so soon after the Nazi Holocaust, was it possible for Chinese communists to repeat its extermination?
As recently as June this year, China rejected any claims of genocide in Tibet.
"The claims of so-called genocide in Tibet are sheer libel, sheer fabrication," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao (
So long as sycophantic nations -- with their dreams of endless lines of Chinese customers -- see China through rose-colored glasses and are unwilling to face the truth, there will be no aid for Tibet, if there is any aid left that will help.
The UN has stood by and smiled at the Dalai Lama and revered him while China destroyed Tibet with impunity. And nations around the world congratulated the Chinese on building a railway to Tibet to complete the final stages of its genocide.
Genocide is what is happening in Tibet. The Chinese have murdered lamas, displaced hundreds of thousands of Tibetans, occupied their land and worked to eradicate the Tibetan culture and religion.
I quote from the report in 1959 by the International Commission of Jurists in Geneva: "Any systematic violation of human rights in any part of the world should, it is submitted, be a matter for discussion by the United Nations."
While the UN may discuss Tibet from time to time, it has done nothing more.
Most people will agree that in the sphere of human rights, some rights are fundamental. The rights of the Tibetans that have been ruthlessly violated are fundamental -- even the right to life itself. With violations of this gravity, it is not a question of human rights being modified to meet the requirements of local conditions. It is a question of conduct that should not be tolerated by the civilized world.
And yet the UN has done nothing. Every diplomat, UN ambassador and representative who has spent time in the UN is guilty of allowing China to commit genocide in Tibet. Even UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan did nothing but smile at China for 10 years.
To fail to protect the rights of hundreds of thousands is a sin. To fail to save a nation, its people, language and culture is morally reprehensible and the height of cowardice and utter failure.
This leads many like myself to question the very existence of the UN. If it cannot prevent the destruction of Tibet, what possible purpose does it serve at all?
The UN is repeating this legacy today in Darfur. Its insistence on talking while genocide occurs is in fact complicity.
Taiwan and the 23 million Taiwanese people could be China's next overt target. If this happens, the UN would likely continue to talk but do nothing as the communists rolled into Taiwan to begin the next phase of their regional rule.
The UN will likely smile upon Beijing during the Olympics in 2008 while it is well aware that once the closing ceremony is held, the country will revert to abusing the rights and liberties of its citizens and regional states alike.
The UN's hopeless inaction resulted in genocide in Tibet. What other countries -- like Taiwan -- could expect if they were to be next is an open question.
The UN is guilty of failing to confront evil. In that respect, it has failed in its original mission.
Lee Long-hwa
United States
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with