Taiwan's 24-hour news broadcasting seems to have created an impression among politicians that "image is everything." Leaders from both the pan-green and pan-blue camps appear to "govern by reading the news," while legislators and councilors "interpellate by following gossip and rumors."
The irony is while the media can make one a hero, it can also easily ruin one's political career.
Long regarded as the media's darling, Taipei Mayor and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Recent allegations that Ma had misused his special allowance fund have cast a huge political shadow on the blue camp's presidential hope, especially in the wake of the indictment last month of first lady Wu Shu-jen(
There are admittedly historical and structural problems in the use of the special fund for ministers, mayors, county commissioners and some 6,500 local chiefs. But since Prosecutor Eric Chen (陳瑞仁) upheld the highest standard when he decided to indict Wu and implicate the president, it would be difficult for Ma to escape the same charges given that his staffer has admitted to collecting fake receipts to claim reimbursements from the mayoral fund.
If the pan-blue camp praised Prosecutor Eric Chen's conclusion that the president and Wu inappropriately used public funds for private use, the same criteria should apply to Ma's handling of the mayoral allowance.
Ma has been busy conducting a spin campaign to contain the damage from the scandal. He apologized to the nation for what he called "administrative defects" in the handling of the fund and donated part of the allowance that he had received over his two terms as mayor to charity -- all the while emphasizing that he had nothing to do with his staffer's personal misconduct.
The pro-unification media has released several surveys showing a drop in Ma's approval rating. They contend, however, that the poll also showed that the majority of the public still believed the mayor was innocent.
Ma's poor handling of the biggest crisis in his career demonstrates a common defect among local politicians. Most political leaders are so focused on building up their image that they overlook the importance of transcending their campaign message by incorporating stronger discipline.
A majority of local politicians also tend to overstate the power of money, spin, scandal, voter self-interest and image. Ma should keep in mind, however, that those who live by the image shall die by the image. Issues are more important than image, and strategy matters more than tactics.
On the eve of his stepping down as Taipei mayor, Ma will only be remembered for his failure to execute internal reforms within the KMT. The pan-blue legislators' continued boycott of vital bills such as the arms procurement budget, sunshine laws and legislation to deal with stolen party assets, as well as their filibuster of the Control Yuan nominees have all contributed to the erosion of Ma's popularity.
While image is everything to modern political leaders, how they live up to that image deserves more attention. A more discerning public now demands that candidates spell out their program, vision and ideas and then they will elect them to fulfill that specific mandate. Ma's road to the presidency will be compromised if he cannot learn these political lessons.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under