Indictments on corruption and forgery charges in connection with the handling of the Presidential Office's "state affairs fund" were handed down on Nov. 3. Although President Chen Shui-bian (
One possibility is that although Chen felt he really has a reason to avoid explaining the anomalies in the fund reimbursements, he felt he had to make concessions because of moral and social pressures. Another possibility is that high-ranking Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) officials are distancing themselves from him as they want to safeguard the party. If this is the case, then it was the logic of power that forced concessions from Chen.
These two possibilities are connected with the indictment. Although it includes flaws spotted by former Presidential Office secretary-general Chen Shih-meng (
Supporters may try to defend Chen by blaming loopholes in the judicial system or even a conspiracy, but they must recognize that the law has the final word. As to the question of whether "state affairs fund" money was used for secret diplomacy, Chen has not given any clear explanation yet, regardless of what he would base such an explanation on.
As a result, political pressure will linger, and the remainder of Chen's term will be tortuous. The scandal could influence next year's legislative elections and the 2008 presidential election. This means that attempts by high-ranking DPP officials such as Premier Su Tseng-chang (
In-depth reporting over the past few days has revealed staggering interaction among high-ranking government officials, and even the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) has reversed its decision to support the third presidential recall motion -- an action that someone called "safeguarding Chen at the cost of damaging the party's own image."
The problem is that high-ranking DPP officials want more than just Chen's agreement to step down if his wife is convicted. Their demands also include allowing the third recall motion and then final approval in a public referendum.
How can Su support the possibility of a third recall motion, but not the TSU? How can Hsieh distance himself from Chen, but not from the "no longer officially existing" New Tide faction?
If TSU Taipei mayoral candidate Clara Chou (周玉蔻) understood this, she would not complain so much about being pushed into a corner. Chou's recent public letter attacking the DPP [for being more corrupt and incompetent than the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)] and other negative campaign materials have scared away potential supporters.
Similarly, pro-Chen social groups should stop and think about their goals, rather than rashly falling back on nationalism.
We have entered a new age. The red-shirted protesters are not the only ones to find themselves in a difficult situation. We should all consider where we stand -- only if we can convince ourselves can we convince others.
Chen Yi-shen is an associate researcher in the Institute of Modern History at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under