American Institute in Taiwan Director Stephen Young's recent press conference marked a watershed in US intervention in Taiwan's internal affairs.
In an unprecedented move, Young "set" a year-end deadline for the legislature to pass a "robust" arms bill. The protocol-breaking move underscored the urgency Washington places on improving Taiwan's ability to defend itself.
The US likely believes that the nation's reluctance to arm itself not only limits its role in Washington's defense strategy for the western Pacific, but also renders Taiwan a security liability.
If the arms situation persists, the US-Japan security alliance could conceivably change its focus from defending Taiwan to merely seeking to prevent the nation from turning into a secure base for Beijing.
The current "downward spiral" in the level of US-Taiwan military exchanges could evince the onset of such a transition.
Young seemed to be giving a direct warning to pan-blue leaders Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Instead of a plea, Young delivered an ultimatum. The unambiguous message to the nation: Throw the rascals out or brace for the dire consequences. Washington wants the nation to decide -- and soon -- whether it still has the will to defend itself or if it is content to continue its slow transformation into a satellite of China.
Young's effort to stay above the fray of local politics sets his comment apart from the conflicting information Taiwan's politicians and media have been feeding the general public. His talk should have the effect of awakening the nation from its security stupor.
Taiwan's paralysis in the face of China's unrelenting military buildup is a reflection of the nation's political polarization rather than its desire to take advantage of US largesse.
As often insinuated by Taiwan's antagonists in the US, the nation's inability to pass an arms bill is nothing but an abdication of its responsibilities at the potential expense of US lives.
Because Young's public exhortations are backed by the weight of the US government, his message likely reflects Washington's position on the arms bill. But it could also become instrumental in poking holes in the impervious pan-blue legislative voting block. In turn, this might even ease the impasse that grips Taiwan's politics today.
This assertion stems primarily from the fact that arms purchase is but one of a host of bills that have been stymied without proper explanation by the KMT-dominated legislature for years. Just about everything that would contribute to the nation's sovereignty, judicial reforms, transitional justice and clean government has fallen victim to the KMT's unique brand of obstruction.
Young's warning could force Ma and the KMT to make a choice between Ma's ambition to be president -- which requires US support -- and the deep-blue faction's resolve to keep Taiwan's defense purchase bottled up. The pan-blue camp is uncomfortable about actually revealing its true vision of the nation's relationship with China, but Young's remarks have had the effect of forcing them to decide whether they side with Washington or Beijing.
Flushing the pan-blue camp's intentions out into the open is bound to create a chink in the armor that keeps the KMT legislative majority intact, thereby allowing at least a trickle -- if not a deluge -- of legislation to pass. The KMT's difficulty in explaining away its about-face on weapons procurement would increase the pressure on it to pass other important bills.
In case Ma and company opt to continue the deadlock despite Young's efforts, the electorate will have to decide whether it concurs with the KMT.
Hopefully, despite the fractured nature of Taiwanese politics, Young's bombshell will lead the nation to forge a consensus about its security and its security guarantor.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry