A reading of the lengthy indictment of first lady Wu Shu-jen (
Many of the so-called "facts" of the case were brought forward by those whose goal is to force President Chen Shui-bian (
Regardless of what the future brings, Chen's bright image as the "son of Taiwan" has already been irreparably tarnished.
On the other end of the spectrum, some maintain the hidden goal of preventing Chen and Wu from being indicted or serving prison sentences.
Regrettably, the reality is that on both sides of the debate, the discourse has been hijacked by the logic of politics, and so consideration of right and wrong has been supplanted by concern for partisan gains.
As I write this article, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is continuing its closed-door meetings and many unexpected variables remain that could influence the current political situation.
The overall picture, however, has become clear: Chen looks likely to struggle to retain the presidency despite a third recall motion and the looming possibility of impeachment, recall hearings, street protests and court hearings, which together will provide a severe test for Taiwan's democracy.
But no matter how the situation develops, the following points deserve more consideration and action.
First, though there is no strict legal definition for the "constitutional crimes" that Chen has been accused of, the term is still a concept very pertinent to the situation. The presidency and Taiwan's four other Yuans are all constitutional institutions.
Constitutional bodies cannot commit crimes in themselves, but the people entrusted with exercising their power are capable of all kinds of offenses.
While those in power remain in their posts, there are systems in place to make sure that the government's separation of power doesn't become unbalanced.
This is why the Constitution places direct controls -- such as restrictions on indictments, immunity and impeachment -- on actions that one branch of the government take take against another.
The result of such controls is to allow those wielding power to have the necessary leeway to leave at an appropriate time.
This leeway has been built into the system not to enable the accused to "save face," but instead to maintain the dignity of the constitutional system.
Thus, if those in control of constitutional organizations abuse their power or behave inappropriately, a method has been established that allows them to find an appropriate exit strategy under the constitutional system.
Second, in the past decade, there have been at least two instances where the law stepped in to resolve major political crises. The first was Constitutional Interpretation 261 -- made by the Council of Grand Justices in 1990 -- which ruled that Taiwanese legislators elected in China had to seek re-election to keep their positions.
The second legal intervention came two years ago during the controversy over the 2004 presidential election when the courts averted a major conflict by certifying the results, thereby giving the pan-blue camp a result it had to accept, at least superficially.
It's still unclear whether or not the indictment of the first lady and possible indictment of the president will lead to a third legal intervention, but there should be some concern about the impact of such judicial intervention on Taiwan's democratic development.
The law is meant to be passive, focused on specific cases and past events, whereas the realm of politics is active, universal and forward looking.
If Taiwan resorts to judicial interventions such as invoking the Constitution, the Election Recall Law (選罷法) and the Criminal Code on a repeated basis, it could cause credibility crises for the nation's judicial system and political system.
Third, the nation has yet to develop a truly strong civil society. A call by pan-green academics on July 15 for Chen to step down and the appearance of the red-clad anti-Chen protesters serve to underscore this weakness.
But more shocking is that many of the organizations and intellectuals that have long criticized the shortcomings of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime have gradually not only softened their arguments when faced with the scandals surrounding Chen and the the DPP, but have even become apologists for the party and for the president.
While to a lesser extent this has cost these organizations and people the ability to criticize Chen and the members of his family for scandal, it has greatly diminished their power to attack the failings of the government and its policies, which is much more important.
Finally, I want to emphasize that the pan-blue camp has also played a large part in hindering the nation from becoming a truly strong democracy.
Many in the pan-green camp have not forgotten the pan-blue camp's sale of its stolen assets, nor have they forgotten the dictatorial rule of KMT leaders.
In addition, the pan-blue camp has abused its majority position in the legislature for a long time, failing to pass legislation that would improve the nation's system of government while calling frequent press conferences to discuss vastly more petty matters.
And pan-blue legislators have openly violated the Constitution by boycotting hearings on appointments to the Control Yuan, suspending the function of the Constitution's most important oversight institution.
While many are fixated on the indictments either handed down or threatened against the first family, they should not forget the real harm caused by the blue-dominated legislature.
Even in the center of a large-scale political dispute, a democratic people must never forget the importance of constant self reflection and continued effort.
Our politicians, political parties and politics will forever be a reflection of the quality of our democracy.
If we believe that corruption will always follow power, then we should continue to consider how power should be bestowed, and take precautions to ensure that it is not abused.
Yen Chueh-an is a law professor at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Marc Langer
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under