A landmark peace deal in Nepal to end a decade-old conflict remained tentative as Maoists and the government were still at odds on rebel arms and the future of the king, analysts said.
The historic agreement had "generated lots of hope and optimism, but it is not complete," said Kapil Shrestha, a political science professor at Nepal's Tribhuvan University.
In the early hours of Wednesday, the two sides clinched a deal that would see the rebels place their weapons under UN supervision, in return for being granted 73 seats in a 330-seat interim parliament and joining an interim government.
"It [the agreement] cannot automatically lead to perpetual peace and tranquility. We still have a lot more to do to address the core issues of conflict," Shrestha said.
A Western diplomat echoed Shrestha's assessment.
"It's an important milestone but much work remains to be done. Implementation is the key," the diplomat said on condition of anonymity. "Not surprisingly, arms management is one of the main weaknesses in the agreement because it's such a complicated issue."
The rebels had pledged to confine militia and arms to seven camps around the country, but the logistics of the plan were complicated, the diplomat said.
"What will happen to the militia? What sanctions will there be if the agreement is broken? Can the UN really monitor all the weapons?" the diplomat said.
Those details will be handled by UN representative Ian Martin, who was appointed by Secretary-General Kofi Annan as his personal representative in the peace process.
Martin has four experts -- a Norwegian general, a political adviser, a ceasefire monitoring adviser and an electoral adviser -- to oversee the arms deal.
They would be expected to encounter tension in the peace deal's implementation, said Rabindra Khanal, a political science professor at Tribhuvan, Nepal's oldest university.
"The deal is positive but it is just a basic agreement. More tensions lie ahead on the issues of monarchy and arms management," Khanal said.
The rebels had their work cut out trying to gain the legitimacy they sought, Khanal added.
"There is also the need to change their party policies. They will need to get along with people in the coming days, [and] they must now focus on giving up arms to build trust and confidence," he said.
The other major issue is the fate of the monarchy, which the agreement says will be decided after elections, at the first meeting of a body charged with rewriting Nepal's Constitution.
The rebels had previously said the only future for the king was death or exile, but have since tempered their line since they joined with political parties to end King Gyanendra's direct rule in April.
They now say they will abide by the constituent assembly's decision.
Until then, the agreement states that Gyanendra "will have no authority over national administration."
The king, who was stripped of control of the army, might lobby to retain a role in what, until April, was the world's only Hindu monarchy, but he was expected to go along with whatever decision was made, the diplomat said.
"I think he will accept this, as he has no other choice. But come the time of the constituent assembly election he will become more active," he said.
Signs of dissent on terms of the deal over the king were already evident on Wednesday.
Nepal's second-largest party in the ruling coalition, the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist Leninist), had reservations on how the position of monarchy would be decided.
"Our party has written a note of dissent to instead have a referendum to decide the future of the monarchy," said Madhav Kumar Nepal, the general secretary of the party.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs