The Iraqi and US governments on Sunday tried to portray former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's death sentence as a step towards a new era, but there were plenty of signs that it could be a step into the dark.
The starkest challenge facing those trying to pull Iraq back from the brink of all-out civil war is the bitter conflict between extremist factions of the majority Shiite and minority Sunni communities, and Sunday's judgment served to reinforce that divide.
"Saddam's symbolic power was enhanced with the death sentence. He is now a living martyr," said Joost Hiltermann, Middle East director of the International Crisis Group think tank.
"To some extent he still carries influence over Sunni insurgents. I think once he is dead his impact will fade quickly, but his execution will have a bigger reaction in terms of violence," he said.
Demonstrations for and against the ousted leader erupted in several areas of Iraq and were replayed at length on Iraqi and regional media, underlining the deepening split in society more than three years after Saddam's fall.
"The divisions will continue. There will be more blood, more divisions and more rifts. The prime minister and the government will be responsible for that," a spokesman for the prominent Sunni lawmaker Saleh Mutlak said.
The verdict did not even enjoy unanimous acclaim within Iraq's elected post-Saddam government of national unity.
Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki hailed the decision as an end to Saddam's era and a step towards halting violence, but President Jalal Talabani held his counsel and Sunni Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi's party issued a scathing response.
"Iraqis have the right to wonder if the new regime has shown a better example than the old one," the statement from the Iraqi Islamic Party said.
"Are the crimes committed by the former regime not committed today?" asked the party, which is part of the ruling coalition.
"Crimes today include sectarian killing and cleansing, which were not known before. These take place every day under the sight of the government and indeed with the backing of the security forces," it alleged.
The US' plan for restoring order in Iraq and withdrawing its 150,000 strong force hinges on building strong, professional security services, but verdict day showed up divisions within those ranks, too.
In Baghdad, police turned a blind eye when the citizens of the sprawling Sadr City neighborhood breached a supposedly strict curfew to hold rallies to celebrate Saddam's conviction and support radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr.
In the Sunni town of Samarra, uniformed and armed police paraded with Saddam's portrait amid a 200-strong crowd chanting support for Saddam, holy war and the al-Qaeda terror group.
"We hope this sentence will not lead to more divisions among the Iraqis. We hope that would not lead to repercussions and security problems," prominent Kurdish lawmaker Mahmud Othman said.
"Iraqis have suffered from big problems and we hope this sentence will not add any others," he said.
Against this backdrop, the White House's analysis of the verdict aftermath seemed optimistic at best.
"You now have absolute proof that you've got an independent judiciary in Iraq," White House spokesman Tony Snow told NBC television.
Most international watchdogs have criticized the court as biased towards Maliki's position, while Sunni protesters have bitterly accused the judge of being in the pay from everyone from Tel Aviv to Tehran.
"If you want the broader context, you also have to understand that the people of Iraq themselves are devoted and dedicated to the business of building a democracy," Snow said.
While that may be so, on Sunday night Shiite protesters seemed more concerned with rubbing their Sunni neighbors faces in their hero's humiliation, while many Sunnis were all but threatening full-scale war.
"The pronouncement at the court is a crime against Iraq, its future and history," said Sheikh Abdel-Rahman Munshid al-Asi, a prominent leader of the Sunni Al-Obeidi tribe.
"The Iraqi government and its constituent parties should be held responsible for what will happen to Iraq as a repercussion for this unlucky day. The risks will be catastrophic," he said.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose