China's weekend summit with Africa marked a milestone in its global emergence, giving it more leverage against the West and setting it up for more oil and other trade deals, analysts said yesterday.
The turnout for the two-day summit in Beijing that ended on Sunday spoke volumes. Delegations from 48 African nations attended, including 41 heads of state or government -- an illustration of Beijing's growing clout.
"[China] gave a party and everybody came. It's a big deal," said David Zweig, an expert on Chinese foreign policy at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
China's state press wasted no time trumpeting the summit as a "milestone."
"It consolidated the traditional friendship between Chinese and African people [and] injected new energy into China-Africa cooperation," an editorial in the People's Daily said yesterday.
China has faced accusations that it worsens repression and human rights abuses in Africa through support for countries such as Sudan and Zimbabwe in a cynical drive to increase access to African oil and other resources.
There has also been criticism that Beijing undermines the current Western policy of denying aid to countries with repressive governments.
But China shrugged off those claims during the summit and served notice it would continue to challenge the Western diplomatic and economic strategies for Africa.
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
China also said it would double aid by 2009 and would offer US$5 billion in loans and credit to African countries.
And unlike the approach from the US and institutions such as the IMF, the offers came with no democracy or human rights strings attached, freeing up nations such as Sudan to get easy money.
"Now, some countries can get aid and investment without improving on [human rights and democracy] issues. This is another challenge to the Western countries," said Yen Chen-shen (嚴震生), a researcher at Taiwan's Institute of International Relations.
China sweetened the diplomatic deal even further with a US$1.9 billion package of trade and investment deals in Africa.
They included an aluminum production plant in Egypt worth US$938 million, a US$300 million contract for Chinese firms to upgrade a highway in Nigeria, a US$200 million copper project in Zambia, and other deals with Sudan, South Africa, Kenya, Cape Verde and Ghana.
Contrary to expectations, no major African energy deals were announced during the summit, but the goodwill engendered here will no doubt lead to greater Chinese access to African energy resources, Yen said.
"China needs energy from Africa. It needs to import a lot of oil nowadays since its economy is growing so fast, and China can get it from African countries through the summit," he said.
Turning Western criticism around, China sought to seize the moral high ground by calling in a joint communique for greater investment and aid from rich nations to help poor African countries, regardless of who governs them.
"They don't talk about it but in some way they are challenging the moral position of the IMF and the United States on conditional aid. I think this is very important for the Chinese," Zweig said.
Africa was high on China's agenda during the Cold War, when Beijing was diplomatically isolated and desperate to expand its sphere of influence.
That waned beginning in the 1980s, Zweig said, as the need for technology and capital prompted China to reach out to the West and Japan.
But with those relationships now quite solid, China sees a resumption of its traditionally strong African ties as further bolstering its international clout.
"I think it's significant. It's the biggest event in terms of China refocusing its attention on the developing world," Zweig said.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose