With the completion of the candidates' registration for the year-end Taipei mayoral race, the election is now widely seen as a warm-up for the 2008 presidential poll. In addition to former presidential candidates -- People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) and independent Legislator Li Ao (李敖) -- former Kaohsiung mayor and premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷), who has yet to deny his ambitions to run for the nation's highest office, has thrown his hat into the mayoral race. It is clear that the outcome of this election will have have an impact on the 2008 race.
The question is why Hsieh, after giving up the premiership, was willing to humble himself and run for the mayorship. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) are still struggling under the weight of the corruption allegations against Chen's family members and close aides. Hsieh himself is finding it hard to steer clear of the fallout from the irregularities surrounding the construction of the Kaohsiung mass rapid transit (MRT) system. Many DPP supporters therefore regard Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) as the party's savior.
To help Su secure a shot at the presidency in 2008, his followers are attempting to distance him from Chen to avoid being implicated in the scandal surrounding the president. By the same token, they also want to remove any potential competitors to avoid the prospect of an ugly DPP presidential primary that could further damage the party's image. They have already succeeded in forcing former DPP legislator Shen Fu-hsiung (沈富雄) to drop his mayoral ambitions and called on Hsieh to run for the post instead.
From the perspective of Su's supporters, Hsieh's chances of winning the mayoral race in Taipei -- traditionally a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) stronghold -- are, of course, slim. The controversy surrounding the construction of the Kaohsiung MRT is bound to haunt him during the campaign. Putting Hsieh under public scrutiny will weaken his ability to move toward the DPP's presidential nomination. And if Hsieh fails to garner enough votes in the Taipei race, he will not have enough momentum or support to compete with Su for the 2008 election.
After his resignation as premier, Hsieh started his unofficial campaign for the 2008 race by undertaking inspection tours around the country and befriending many people in the non-governmental sector in order to extend his influence beyond Kaohsiung. While Su's supporters may think that a "loser" is not entitled to another shot at office, they cannot deny the fact that Chen won the presidency after having lost the Taipei mayorship to Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Why wouldn't Hsieh be able to pull off the same trick?
As for Hsieh, it is by no means unreasonable for him to run for Taipei mayor. The media focus involved in a mayoral election in the nation's capital and the sympathy he has generated from the pan-green's small voter base in Tai-pei for "sacrificing himself for the sake of the party" could turn him into a hero for many DPP supporters. This would be a big step toward building up his momentum for the presidency even if he were to lose the mayoral election.
Su, on the other hand, has the vantage point of the premiership and has allied himself with DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun to suppress Hsieh. This could, however, make him the strongest opponent in the eyes of the pan-blue camp, which could prompt them to launch an early attack against the premier. And with the opposition holding a legislative majority, anything short of a good political record and a clean image could land Su in hot water.
Meanwhile, on the pan-blue front, Soong's registration for the Taipei race has been followed by rumors from within the PFP that he has hinted at the possibility of pulling out of the race. The main difference between Soong and Hsieh is that it doesn't seem very likely that Soong will run for the presidency again in 2008. Soong's main consideration in running for the mayorship is that his popularity has continued to fall since the 2000 presidential election, and he wants to use the election to leverage the remainder of his popularity to extend the PFP's existence.
While Soong may want to leverage his image as a hardworking and caring public official during his stint as Taiwan provincial governor -- that was already a long time ago. During the intervening years, his clashes with Chen and other political incidents have left the public with the impression of a scheming and calculating character.
For Taipei residents, Soong has nothing new to offer. His purpose in putting all his energies into the mayoral election is to help all those who have supported him along the way so that they will not be weighed down by the PFP label in the year-end city councilor elections.
This is also why Soong has taken an unexpected leave of absence from his post as PFP chairman to run as an indepen-dent, just as he did in the 2000 presidential election when he "left" the KMT. This strategy, however, ignores the fact that most of those who voted for him in 2000 were pan-blue supporters, who only pinned their hopes on Soong because the KMT's candidate, then vice president Lien Chan (連戰), was falling behind in the polls and they did not want Chen to win. Looking ahead to the year-end mayoral election, pan-blue supporters' longing for unity means that it will be difficult for Soong to garner the same support that he did before.
If winning the Taipei mayorship is not Soong's main objective in running, but rather protecting and supporting PFP city councilor candidates, his strategy should be to maintain his campaign's momentum and preserve the PFP's independence. And then, just a few days before election day, he should show his concern for pan-blue unity by voicing his support for the KMT's candidate, Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), but at the same time calling on the people to save the PFP.
Such a tragic call might arouse the sympathy of pan-blue voters, who may appreciate the sacrifice that Soong and the PFP are making, and create an atmosphere where they would want to do right by the PFP. This would boost the position of the PFP's city councilor candidates at the last crucial moment. Maybe this would be the most rational choice Soong could make.
All in all, the year-end election is already considered an indicator of the 2008 race. Ma's ability to maintain his position as the pan-blue camp's crown prince and Su's and Hsieh's ability to cooperate will help decide who will be the last man standing in the 2008 presidential race.
Lin Tai-wei is a doctoral candidate in National Chengchi University's department of political science.
Translated by Daniel Cheng and Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry