Muslim women welcome a debate about the status of women in Islam. Intelligent, honest critique is an invaluable source of ideas for Muslims as we begin the process of reclaiming our religious and intellectual tradition.
Muslim women also welcome feminist alliances with other women in the task of challenging the misuse of power by Muslim men -- just as we can offer our own perspective on both women's advances and setbacks in the West.
But such public debate and alliances obviously don't take place in a vacuum, but in a social, racial and political context. It would be naive to imagine that the domestic debate about Islam -- and Muslim women in particular -- can be hermetically sealed off from the politics of the "war on terror," as the last couple of weeks have demonstrated. In the UK, the columnist Polly Toynbee was right to say that "women's bodies have been the battle flag of religions."
But the significance of religious and cultural symbols such as the veil is not immutable and static -- they have a mixed and changing social meaning.
Muslim women who adopt the veil in Europe may simultaneously be seeking to affirm their religious identity while being determined to enter the public sphere as full and equal citizens.
They are often also trying to change the cultural and political meaning of the veil in a contemporary context. For some, it may be linked to patriarchal pressure; for others a symbol of identity and emancipation in a commodified and patriarchal society -- and for many, a response to a religious vocation.
Feminist politics needs to be flexible and respond to these complexities. And for Muslim women their religion and even their gender are not the only, or the most grievous, focus of their oppression -- their bodies have also been, and continue to be, a battleground for European and US imperialism.
Lord Cromer, British consul general in Egypt in the late 19th century, famously justified British colonial rule by arguing that it could liberate Egyptian women from their oppressive veils.
Commenting on French colonialism in Algeria in the 1950s, the writer Frantz Fanon noted: "There is also in the European the crystallization of an aggressiveness, the strain of a kind of violence before the Algerian woman.
Unveiling this woman is revealing her beauty; it is baring her secret, breaking her resistance [to colonial rule]. There is in it the will to bring this woman within his reach, to make her a possible object of possession," Fanon wrote.
When the US launched its so-called war on terror in Afghanistan in 2001, US President George W. Bush glorified his aims by stating: "Because of our recent military gains in much of Afghanistan, women are no longer imprisoned in their homes ... The fight against terrorism is also a fight for the rights and dignity of women."
The US social anthropologists Saba Mahmood and Charles Hirschkind have noted that the relationship between the Bush administration and some US feminists was reciprocal and intimate.
"By the time the war started, feminists like [Eleanor] Smeal could be found cozily chatting with the general about their shared enthusiasm for Operation Enduring Freedom and the possibility of women pilots commandeering F-16s," they said.
By December 2001, 3,767 Afghans, including women and children, were reported to have been killed by US bombs.
The "war on terror" moved to Iraq in 2003. Once again, Bush included concern for the rights of women as one of his war aims.
"Respect for women ... can triumph in the Middle East and beyond," he told the UN in 2002.
Four years later, as Iraq spirals into a violent abyss, women are paying the highest human costs for foreign invasion -- an ever increasing number of victims of murder, rape and abduction.
Female politicians in British Prime Minister Tony Blair's Cabinet are falling over each other in their enthusiasm to protect the rights of vulnerable Muslim women.
Yet these same politicians voted to launch aggressive war against Iraq. Muslim women listen in amazement when these women, their "feminist sisters," are praised for their "bravery" in speaking out so freely about protecting them from the veil when none of them felt it necessary to resign their political office when it became clear that illegal war had unleashed a tide of violence, killing vast numbers of Iraqi women and children.
In offering support to Muslim women, all feminists need to be strategic and prioritize the harm those women actually suffer.
In the UK, female politicians and other feminists from the majority community would do well to reconsider the disproportionate weight they are giving to complex symbols such as the veil, which can undermine alliances around more grievous harms such as war, violence, genuine patriarchal oppression and poverty.
By attacking the veil -- as in the colonial past -- they may strengthen many Muslim women's commitment to it and make it more difficult for Muslims to have a much needed debate on women and Islam.
Those feminists who give well-meaning lectures to Muslim women on what they should think, say and wear are not in the end alone.
There is a risk that their powerful female voices will inadvertently sustain another political discourse: the words and actions of an illustrious line of men who continue to justify their imperial ambitions on the bodies -- often dead bodies -- of Muslim women.
Maleiha Malik is a lecturer in law at King's College London.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and