The red-clad anti-President Chen Shui-bian (
These protesters are aligned with pro-unification and pro-China ideology, as evidenced by their cries of "Long live the Republic of China" and "Defend the Republic of China." It is thus bizarre to see them trample on the ROC's "temporary capital," dispel its symbolic image as the center of the ROC and paralyze its ability to fulfill its functions as the nation's capital. Many believe that now is the time to make a concerted effort to move the capital away from Taipei.
When former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) proposed freezing or abolishing the Taiwan provincial government more than 10 years ago, I repeatedly wrote that moving the capital, sharing the title among different cities, or spreading out its functions could help end the abnormal quasi-country condition Taiwan had been saddled with since the arrival of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) forces.
In March 2003, when Chen was elected as a representative of the pro-localization Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), I urged even more forcefully that with Taiwan embarking on a new leadership under its "native son," the most pressing need was to deal with the seat of government.
No matter how difficult or how much of an uproar the move might cause, I believed that the Chen administration needed to do its utmost to bring about transitional justice to prevent the old, deep-rooted KMT regime from launching a counter attack.
Moreover, the government should begin planning to move or split up the capital, or at the very least spread out its functions. This would enable it to move out of the shadow of housing an "adjunct capital" or "temporary capital" that Taipei had been for an oppressive, foreign feudal regime for more than a century.
But after procrastinating for six years, the DPP seems to be imprisoned in the shell of the old foreign regime. It can barely move, and is bound to draw criticism if it does. The consequences of its failures are all around us: Its promises are left unfulfilled and national affairs have been thrown into chaos. What's more, not a day goes by without the pro-China media sneering that the "the localized regime doesn't exist" and that "transitional justice is a joke."
While the DPP and Chen administration cannot shirk their responsibility for governing poorly and treating transitional justice lightly, this begs the question of will any of the following administrations be able to do better. How can we afford not to seize the opportunity offered by the self-destructive anti-Chen movement -- the so-called bourgeoisie "popular revolution" and its mock "siege" -- to begin spreading out the functions of the capital?
We should begin by abolishing Taipei's status as the capital to remove the last vestiges of a feudal, centralized and authoritarian regime. Tearing down these forces is meant to be an opportunity to rebuild or reconstruct the nation, whether it's based in Taiwanese awareness, Taiwanese autonomy, or other ideals to ensure long-term peaceful development. We should have gotten rid of the old thinking of the capital as a single entity long ago, as this plays right into the hands of Bei-jing's strategy to contain Taiwan.
We need to dispel the old myth that moving the capital would lead to a battle over resources among different areas of the country, and instead set Taiwan on the path to a decentralized and balanced development. For example, Tainan could be made the cultural capital, Kaohsiung the maritime capital, Hualien the scenic capital, Hsinchu the technological capital and Taichung the administrative seat.
Only by looking at Taiwan as a whole -- unearthing each area's advantages and uniqueness, focusing on their available resources and continuing to expand the use of this land -- can there be hope of developing a Taiwanese awareness that can play a more significant role in the global community.
Woody Cheng is a professor in the department of history at National Cheng Kung University
Translated by Marc Langer
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s