When it comes to tuna fishing, Taiwan is one of the world's biggest players.
Despite its small size, the nation ranks sixth among the deep-sea fishing nations in the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian oceans, with a majority of its tuna catch going to satisfy domestic and Japanese demand for sashimi.
Last year the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas slashed Taiwan's quota for tuna from 14,900 tonnes to 4,600 tonnes after allegations -- ironically from one of its biggest customers, Japan -- of overfishing and fish laundering or labeling fish taken from the Atlantic Ocean as being from somewhere else.
The Council of Agriculture announced recently that it wants the nation's tuna quotas reinstated next year and will present new management and surveillance measures to the global commission next month in a bid to get the catch restored to its previous level.
The council's move is undoubtedly a result of commercial pressure, as the tuna trade is a lucrative business. Many of Taiwan's ships are owned by influential businesspeople like members of the Koo (
But Taiwan's stance on tuna fishing issue appears confused. While on the one hand the council is lobbying for an increase in the nation's tuna catch, on the other it has introduced rules and regulations in an attempt to practice conservation and curb over fishing. A new rule enforced by the council in June to limit the number of fishing vessels blocked the release of two new US$10 million tuna-catching purse seiners owned by Koo's Fishing Co and destined for registration in the Marshall Islands.
As expected, both Koo Kwang-ming (
But the government's position is a contradiction, and it should clarify its position on tuna fishing. Does it believe in conservation or exploitation? This is important because governments and fishing companies seem incapable of attaining a happy medium.
But all this haggling over quotas and licensing of boats diverts attention from the real issue -- that man's hunger for seafood is doing untold damage to the world's oceans. One prominent environmentalist recently predicted that if the global fishing industry continues unchecked, the world's fish stocks could be all but exhausted within 15 years.
Taiwan, Japan and the rest of the world need to sit up and take notice of these claims. Even if the figures are alarmist, there is no doubt about the havoc being wrought on the world's seas.
Governments and the fishing industry have got to accept that high-tech factory ships that drag giant nets along the seabed and swallow up whole schools of fish are not the way to practice sustainable fishing. Whining about fishermen's jobs when quotas or bans are introduced is a moot point. If fishing carries on in its current form, sooner or later the world's fishermen will be looking for alternative employment.
Unless nations around the globe bring in real sustainable quotas which are strictly enforced with the help of navies and coast guards, the future certainly looks bleak.
Fishing, it seems, has not learned the lesson of the North Atlantic cod, which about a decade ago was fished to the point where experts believe stocks will never recover.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under