Anti-European sentiment is likely to rise in Turkey after a bill was approved by France's lower house of parliament to make denying that the World War I killings of Armenians were genocide a crime, analysts warned on Friday.
This could weaken Ankara's hand in pushing through reforms to boost its struggling EU bid, they noted.
The Turkish government threatened Paris with unspecified measures and a deterioration in bilateral ties after Thursday's vote on the nationally explosive issue. Ankara holds that the 1915-1917 killings were not an act of genocide.
For the Turkish public, the French vote means France is opposed to Ankara's EU aspirations and is another European affront to Turkey's future membership, said Cengiz Aktar, director of the EU center at Istanbul's Bahcesehir University.
"The vote goes far beyond the Armenian issue," Aktar said. "The deep rationale behind it is the way the French political elite is looking at Turkey. There is a deep mistrust of Turkey's candidacy and future membership."
"The Turkish man in the street will interpret the French vote as a vote coming from the whole of Europe," he said.
Turkish public support for EU membership has been declining since Ankara began accession talks last October amid widespread scepticism on whether this mainly Muslim country has a place in Europe.
According to an EU survey, the ratio of Turks supporting EU membership dropped to 44 percent last spring compared to 55 percent in the fall of last year and more than 70 percent two years ago.
"At a time when relations between Europe and France are in a bad state," academic Ahmet Insel said, "this confirms that France considers itself as the anti-Turk shield of Europe."
"The more we try to get closer to Europe, the more Europe tries to move away from us," he said.
Sedat Laciner of the International Strategic Studies Institute described the French action as a reflection of an EU-wide "identity crisis" on what Europe really is and whether a Muslim country can belong.
"The issue is related to the Armenians, but on the other hand it is a blow below the belt to Turkey's bid to join the EU," he said.
"Opponents of Turkey's membership instinctively overemphasize tension between Muslims and Christians, placing `barbarian non-European Turks' on one side and `poor Christian victims' on the other," Laciner said.
The Turkish press also largely saw the French vote as a bid to block Turkey's EU bid, warning Ankara to act sensibly and not slacken its drive to bring itself up to European standards.
"Arrogant France does not want to become equals in the EU with the Turks it despises," the popular Vatan newspaper wrote. "It is trying with this unjust act to anger Turkey and make it feel insecure in order to sap its will and determination" to join the EU.
The mass-circulation Sabah said the French vote was a blow to freedom of expression and presented an opportunity to Turkey to shine in the EU membership talks by becoming a champion of rights and freedoms.
"Let us use... this unique opportunity to embarrass those who accuse us of limiting freedom of expression," it said, urging Ankara to amend a controversial penal code article that has been used to prosecute a string of intellectuals for their dissident views.
Turkey is under EU pressure to guarantee freedom of expression by amending Article 301 of the penal code, which stipulates a prison term of up to three years for "insulting Turkishness."
Among those prosecuted under the article was Orhan Pamuk, who won the Nobel Literature Prize on Thursday. Charges against Pamuk were triggered by his remarks challenging the official line on the Armenian massacres. The charges were later dropped on a technicality.
But Laciner said this would not be an easy task for the Ankara government in the current climate.
"Article 301 could have been easily amended but the climate has worsened -- the government's maneuvering room has narrowed and it has difficulties in defending the EU process, especially ahead of elections next year," he said.
Aktar predicted that such a move could create public backlash.
"Any political party in Turkey, especially when heading for elections, will find it very difficult to make more democratic openings. It would be difficult to explain this to the Turkish public," he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry