According to modern science's version of Genesis -- less colorful than the biblical story, but no less wonderful -- Earth was born, together with the Sun and the other planets, in a whirlwind of gas and dust, some 4.5 billion years ago, a little more than 9 billion years after the Big Bang.
A half-billion years later, our planet had recovered sufficiently from the pangs of its violent birth to become physically capable of harboring life.
After less than a half-billion years later, it did indeed harbor life, in particular an entity called the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) that gave rise through evolution to all known living creatures, including microbes of various kinds, plants, fungi, animals and humans.
Primitive organisms arose from nonliving matter in what were probably hot, sulfurous, metal-laden and volcanic waters. This unsavory brew was likely "spiced" with abundant small organic molecules such as amino acids, sugars, nitrogenous bases and other typical components of biological constituents.
One of the most astonishing discoveries of the last decades, revealed by exploration of space, nearby celestial objects and especially meteorites that fell to Earth, is that many of the chemical building blocks of life form spontaneously throughout the universe. Organic chemistry -- so named because it was believed to be a prerogative of living organisms -- has turned out to be the most widespread and banal chemistry: the chemistry of carbon.
How this "cosmic chemistry" gave rise to the first living cells is not known in detail, but the process may be summed up in two words: chemistry and replicability.
Chemistry is the essence of life. Living beings continually manufacture their own constituents from small inorganic and organic building blocks. Catalysts called enzymes and energy derived from sunlight, mineral sources or foodstuffs made by other organisms assist in the process.
Something similar happened in the origin of life, but along pathways, by the action of catalysts and with sources of energy that remain to be identified.
Enormous research efforts have already been devoted to this problem. Much has been learned, but no solution is in sight. All that can be said is that the processes involved must, being chemical, have been highly deterministic and reproducible. This means they are bound to occur under prevailing conditions. If chemistry admitted even a small element of chance, there could be no chemical laboratories and no chemical factories.
The second key word is replicability, the ability of certain information-bearing molecules to induce the making of (complementary) copies of themselves by the machineries responsible for the synthesis of their kind. This function, fulfilled mostly by DNA, was probably first carried out by RNA, a close relative of DNA.
In the beginning, replication concerned only RNA molecules. Soon, RNA molecules became involved in the synthesis of proteins according to RNA-supplied blueprints, so that replication extended to proteins, by way of RNA and eventually DNA. In turn, replication came to affect, by way of proteins, making increasingly complex objects that extended to cells and multi-cellular organisms.
Replication allowed the endless reproduction of the same entities, generation after generation, which is the basis of genetic continuity. Furthermore, because of the inevitable failures in the fidelity of the process, replication necessarily led also to variation -- in replicable form -- and then to competition among the variant lineages for available resources.
The necessary outcome, as first divined by Charles Darwin, was the selection of those lineages most apt to survive and produce progeny under existing conditions. This process became added to chemistry as soon as replicability appeared, operating first on molecules and subsequently on increasingly complex assemblages.
With replication, chance made its appearance, by way of the variations, or mutations, that were offered to the screening action of natural selection. According to all we know, these variations are strictly accidental, totally devoid of any intentionality or foresight, hence the widespread notion that the history of life was ruled by contingency.
But this view ignores the possibility that the array of choices offered by chance to natural selection may be sufficiently extensive to allow an optimal or near-optimal solution to emerge, in which case the process is actually close to obligatory and reproducible under the prevailing conditions.
Indeed, there are strong reasons to believe that optimizing selection may have occurred in the origin and evolution of life more often than is generally assumed. This implies that life, to the extent that it is the product of deterministic chemistry and of optimizing selection, is likely to arise, in a form similar to life as we know it, wherever conditions mimic those that surrounded its birth on Earth, thus justifying today's interest in extraterrestrial life.
But this optimizing selection during evolution is nothing like proof of intelligent design. Irrespective of the arguments put forward in support of the intelligent design theory, which have been abundantly refuted, let it simply be stated that a theory based on an a priori declaration that things are not naturally explainable is not a scientific theory.
By definition, the science is based on the idea that the object of study is naturally explainable. Otherwise, there is no reason to look for an explanation.
What is truly wonderful is how much of nature, including the fundamental features of life, has already proven to be explainable.
Christian de Duve, a Nobel laureate in medicine, is the author of Singularities.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry