Despite strong international criticism, North Korea stormed ahead with its first nuclear test on Monday. US President George W. Bush condemned the test as a provocation of the rest of the world and a threat to international peace and security.
He conferred with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who had just left on a visit to China and South Korea, and the two leaders agreed to push for the UN' Security Council to take "resolute action."
North Korea's nuclear test is a serious blow to international stability in East Asia, and proves that China and the US' efforts to prevent North Korea from joining the nuclear club have been massive failures. The international community originally had high hopes that the six-party talks would persuade North Korea to give up its nuclear aspirations. However, its test has thoroughly proven the ineffectiveness of Beijing's effort to be a leader in international policy, and destroyed any credibility it had as a reliable mediator.
Will Beijing support Japan and the US' proposal for the Security Council to impose tougher sanctions? China sees North Korea as an important buffer country, and believes that it must under no circumstances lose this vital strategic shield. It therefore isn't willing to put pressure on North Korea or do anything that might usher the collapse of Kim Jong-il's regime.
But China has another serious consideration. If the regime is toppled, it will have millions of North Korean refugees pouring across its border, an outcome it is loathe to see. So Beijing only pays lip service to criticizing North Korea for its nuclear test, reiterating its tired old refrain that "North Korea should respect its promise not to go nuclear, suspend all activities that could lead to a worsening of the situation, and return to the six-party talks."
The US' top concern, on the other hand, is that North Korea could develop the ability to attack the US with nuclear weapons and long-range missiles. This week's test proves that the "no war, but no peace either" tactic Bush has adopted over the past six years has been a complete failure. Furthermore, the Bush administration's reliance on China to act as moderator for the six-party talks has been a colossal strategic failure. It is therefore time for a policy reassessment.
If the US isn't capable of deterring North Korea from pursuing its nuclear strategy, Iran will make careful note and not hesitate to speed up its own nuclear weapons program. Other Middle Eastern countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt, will also come to believe that the US and Western Europe's non-proliferation controls are ineffective, and that they must also defend themselves by developing nuclear weapons. This will be an enormous blow to the international community, and so the US must take resolute action.
North Korea will pay no attention to the rest of the world and continue to boost the strength of its nuclear weapons because its leaders believe they are needed to safeguard the nation's security, as well as the survival of Kim Jong-il's personal power. They don't believe that China or Russia are real friends either, and that nuclear weapons are their last resort for defending the country.
North Korea's policy of brinkmanship has forced Japan to once again consider amending its pacifist constitution and build up its military. It also has to decide whether or not it wants to develop its own nuclear weapons.
North Korea has strengthened Abe's position. He has long held that Japan should amend its 1947 Constitution so that military forces can fight alongside allies overseas. The draft of the revised Constitution will maintain Japan's commitment to peace, but it will also allow for Japan to quicken its military buildup and become a normal country.
Parris Chang is a former deputy secretary-general of the National Security Council.
Translated by Marc Langer
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.