Something shocking happened last week, something possibly unprecedented in the nation's history.
A politician said something that made sense.
Believe me, I'd much prefer to heap ridicule on Prez A-bian (
But in last Tuesday's Double Ten National Day address, Chen Shui-bian actually spoke logically.
What's more, he captured in a few breaths what is perhaps the most compelling reason why the lads and ladies in red trotting around Taipei with their thumbs akimbo -- well-intentioned though a few of them may be -- are no friends of this nation's fragile democracy.
To wit: "I am certain that the vast majority of the people, while adamant in demanding that corruption be curbed, do not endorse trials by public opinion based on tabloid reportage. Those who hold high expectations of anti-corruption efforts should place their confidence in the judicial system ... To lightly dismiss or be suspicious of the judiciary merely because its findings and verdicts do not turn out as one had hoped -- this would be the greatest insult and injury to the democratic rule of law."
This is a dangerous trend. What are us snarky members of the commentariat going to do if politicians start going around sounding intelligent?
Fortunately, Chen didn't entirely disappoint. Just a few minutes later, he was having trouble deciding whether he was Moses or Jesus Christ: "Four years later [in the 2004 election], the great people of Taiwan gave me another chance to lead them toward the promised land. I am willing to dedicate my life to bearing the cross for Taiwan."
Isn't there some kind of rule about how many saviors you can liken yourself to in one speech? And why stop at the Christian references? Why not add: "And Allah be praised, I'm willing to wage jihad on behalf of Taiwan's flat-panel producers?"
But A-bian's otherwise sensible comments fell mostly on deaf ears, as opposition politicians vied to see who could look the worst in a red suit, lead security staff in a comic chase through the honor guard and attempt to rush the speaker's podium.
That childish display was a new nadir for the pan-blue -- I mean red -- camp, but my colleagues over at the China Post concluded in Wednesday's editorial that the whole thing was Chen's fault.
"It's you, Mr. President, who compelled the Redshirts [sic] to take to the streets and the opposition lawmakers to give you the thumbs down before the diplomatic corps and the foreign dignitaries. If you, your family and your top lieutenants had not been allegedly or actually involved in scandal after shocking scandal, none of the people would have turned out to demand that you step down."
Ah, I get it: The president's to blame not because there's any evidence he's done anything wrong. It's because there's so many darn allegations. I mean, with so many accusations flying around, some of them must be true, right?
And if you swallow this swipe at Chen by China Post's editorial writer, you would never guess that anyone came out after the 2004 presidential election demanding Chen step down for paying some clown to have him shot.
Now, no one's saying Taiwan's prosecutors, or its democracy, are perfect -- or even that democracy as practiced anywhere on this Earth is a flawless system. It's only healthy for Taiwanese to be skeptical of their institutions. But the point is that over the long run, a democratic system based on the rule of law, an independent judiciary and regular elections is likely to produce better results than a system of mob rule and hunch-based impeachment.
I know, I know -- I'm starting to sound like a press release from the Presidential Office. But I'm not the only one.
In our own sister paper, the Liberty Times, the daughter of protest organizer Shih Ming-teh (
After dispensing with a heart-tugging description of her authorial surroundings -- the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall on a sunny day with her daughter, who just learned how to ride a bike, pedaling away nearby -- Teresa gets to the point: Daddy's on crack.
So that's a slight exaggeration. In her tentative, self-deprecating way, Teresa argues that removing A-bian by street protest could set a bad precedent for the nation's young democracy. So what should Shih focus on instead?
"When I think of the power Dad has in eliciting so much support on Ketagalan Avenue, I wonder: If everyone could just sit down peacefully and reflect on their differences and similarities, then perhaps this power might allow this country to produce a new system, a fine system of constitutional government that suits Taiwan."
The Government Information Office couldn't have put it better itself. Literally, it couldn't have.
Heard or read something particularly objectionable about Taiwan? Johnny wants to know: dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com is the place to reach me, with "Dear Johnny" in the subject line.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under