Many of today's young people joining the anti-President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) protests believe that the future of Taiwan looks bleak. Corrupt politicians squabble over anything but useful and pertinent policy issues. The media spends its time sensationalizing everything, and much too often overlooks the good in society. Our international status seems to be regressing, as country after country breaks official diplomatic ties with us. Our internal affairs are just as messy.
Protests are occurring in Taiwan on a daily basis. Joining a protest may seem like a fun and exciting thing to do with friends and family, but before we do so we should stop for serious contemplation and ask ourselves "What is going on?"
We live in a democracy. In a democracy, registered protests are a legitimate and forceful way for the people to express their opinions. It is a right given to the people by the people as a check to balance executive or legislative power.
But the right to protest should not be abused, and we must ask ourselves about what purpose a non-stop, continuous protest serves. Must we use such a means to achieve our goals, or are we just tearing apart the fabric of a peaceful society and creating chaos?
In a democracy, every individual is allowed to speak freely, as long as what he or she says does not wrongly and falsely accuse or harm another. After reaching a legal voting age, my vote is as sacred as the richest, most powerful man's. I choose my representatives in government to make society better for me and everyone else.
In a democracy, politicians are not absolute rulers; rather, they are accountable to all of us. The people's right to vote as enshrined in the Constitution makes this clear, as do term limits for all public offices. If a politician needs to be removed before his or her term concludes, legal means exist to do so.
The most important thing in a democracy is the rule of law as defined in the Constitution. No one is above the law.
The days of emperors who reigned with a heavenly mandate are gone. Protesting and revolution were the means for removing emperors, but in a democratic system, law and term limits are the ways we remove leaders who no longer have the support of the people.
Like many of the people protesting, I am 26, young and have most of my life still ahead of me. I think it's important to think about what one wants his or her society to be like. We must all ask this question.
I ask the young people who consider participating in the protests to think about the serious consequences for their country, their family and, most importantly, for themselves.
Phillip Wu
Durham, North Carolina
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry