Popular movements serve a necessary function in a democracy by constantly renewing and revitalizing the government. However, we should be more cautious about mass movements that have a divisive effect.
Demonstrations between opposing groups can only harden their resistance to one another and cannot resolve the issue that separates them. Therefore, I call for an end to antagonism between the various pro and anti-President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) movements and an immediate beginning of dialogue and reconciliation among all Taiwanese.
Civil society has long been impinged upon by politics. Fierce opposition between political parties has entangled society in a constant battle that only has one purpose: to defeat the other side. This behavior is more representative of groups of animals in which both sides are caught in an eternal cycle of fighting and dying, winning and losing, without ever questioning whether they are right or wrong. Slowly, society's system of values collapses. This is the main factor in our moral decline.
Most importantly, a society constantly at odds with itself is incapable of developing into a civilized community because it is forever caught up in barbarism and violence. Without an end to strife and hostility, a civilized society is unattainable. True social reform is impossible as well, much less the fulfillment of any long-term plan.
To escape this, the citizenry must step into the public arena and open up dialogue, find common ground and forge an agreement on what kind of political structure they want.
Deadlocks are essentially between society and the government, not within society itself. This is the fundamental principle of democratic governance. But in Taiwan, the divisions that political society have created within civil society have led to turmoil which in turn allows the government to control it. This is the biggest problem facing Taiwan's civil society and democratic governance.
Therefore I call on both sides to engage in dialogue and begin to listen to each other. Chen's supporters do not identify with Chen as much as they seem to do. They are motivated by their memories of the past crimes of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and are unwilling to let the KMT benefit from Chen being toppled.
This may just be a "historical matter" to some, but it is still very much alive within the hearts of many Taiwanese. I believe that only by addressing today's political dispute in its full historical context can it be resolved.
The Million Voices Against Corruption initiated by former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) started off as a movement purely concerned with Taiwan's constitutional government and was free from any overt involvement by political parties. However, it inevitably settled into the same old lines of confrontation.
The campaign provoked a fierce reaction as it traveled to Taiwan's central and southern regions, demonstrating just how deep-rooted and serious these "historical matters" are to many people. This is an important lesson for all Taiwanese to study, including those in the anti-Chen camp.
Therefore I appeal to all anti-Chen demonstrators to face Taiwan's past and seek to promote dialogue with pro-Chen demonstrators. While you demand that Chen bear his political responsibilities, also demand that the KMT accept its historical responsibilities.
Join together and commit to resolving political conflict and the historical issues behind it. In this regard Chen might not just be a source of conflict, but also a turning point for the nation. We should all look at today's problems from this kind of positive angle.
Today, the burden of the KMT's past mistakes fall on the Mainlanders. On the other hand, Chen's errors are thrust upon all Taiwanese, especially non-Mainlanders. This is absolutely unfair. I ask all Taiwanese to do away with their animosity, talk to one another and seek reconciliation. Agree to work toward a civilized society and monitor the government instead of letting yourselves be distracted by it. Citizens in a democratic society do not allow themselves to be acted upon, but take the initiative themselves.
Politicians shouldn't use divisive issues of nationality, independence/unification, party affiliation or history for personal aims. Taiwanese should see through the manipulation of politicians and decide the truth for themselves.
I believe that only through dialogue, understanding and reconciliation will we be able to understand the true nature of these issues. Then after we draw up a social contract and establish responsible government, these problems will be resolved.
It doesn't matter whether we face the KMT's past errors, the DPP's current failings or the problems of any future party. Only by uniting together to monitor the government can a democratic government function normally and give Taiwan a future.
Lii Ding-tsann is a professor in the Graduate School of Sociology at National Tsing-hua University.
Translated by Marc Langer
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations