The coverage being given to New York Yankees pitcher Wang Chien-ming (
The saturation coverage in the popular press and on cable TV mostly reflects the fact that sporting culture in this country remains stunted by neglect. And it is by no means certain that the media bandwagon and Wang's visibility will correct this neglect, even if it does motivate more youngsters to pick up a bat or throw a ball.
Taiwan's struggle to make an impression in team sports points to popular indifference and a lack of government insight into the potential of turning these activities into a vehicle for healthy nationalist feeling, not to mention healthier participants. This unfortunate situation is apparent in sports with a wider international role such as soccer, but in Taiwan's case it is ironically more apparent in sports that already enjoy a degree of commercial support, such as baseball and basketball.
Thus it is that when the national baseball team performed poorly at the Athens Olympics, the public response was resignation rather than demands for accountability. It is as if the public has difficulty identifying with or having too great an emotional stake in the fate of Taiwanese teams. But when a lone professional free of national "baggage" such as Wang performs well in an established foreign market, he or she seems to be a much more realistic object of admiration.
The idiotically named Chinese Professional Baseball League, for its part, is still battling the effects of corruption scandals and fickle ticket sales. As the New York Times wrote recently, Wang's success has had the paradoxical effect of hurting the league in terms of game attendance, even if this does turn out to be a temporary phenomenon.
But there's plenty more fickleness to go around. It is likely that most Taiwanese interest in the Yankees hinges on Wang's presence in the starting line-up, and will fade when he moves on. This should not be surprising, but at some point a considerable weakness is revealed when feverish support is extended to a single player in a team sport -- and at the expense of true understanding of the rest of the league, its teams and the wealth of players.
The attempts by certain members of the pan-green camp to appropriate Wang's success for rhetorical purposes have been predictable, if not entirely comfortable given that Wang has stayed well clear of political matters.
The most interesting thing about this problem, however, is that Wang is so popular now that even the most obnoxiously pro-China media outlets have been forced to give him extensive coverage and describe him in terms of his Taiwaneseness. In other words, he is "one of us," no matter which camp you belong to. It is a curious unity, as the Times article pointed out, coming at a time of political unrest and former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh's (
Still, never let it be said that sports do not provide a healthy political function. In Taiwan's case, Wang is proving to be something of a pressure valve at a time when Shih's red mob was hoping to stir up trouble. Perhaps the excessive concentration on Wang's fortunes masks a cry for help from the average reader or viewer who wants to concentrate on something more aspirational, more positive and more fun.
If this is the case, then for the next little while, it's going to be all Wang, all the time.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with