On Sept. 26, Japan's Liberal Dem-ocratic Party Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe was elected prime minister -- the youngest since World War II, and the first to have been born after the war.
Three days later, Abe drew international attention when he laid out his policy priorities to parliament, maintaining that Japan should closely study cases where the right of collective self-defense may entitle the nation to project its military power.
It's worth considering how Taiwan should react to Abe's efforts to "normalize" his country and revise the Japanese Constitution, which does not currently permit the Self-Defense Force to make war against other countries or play a military role overseas.
Some Taiwanese media outlets have made a fuss about Abe's maternal grandfather Kishi Nobusuke, who was arrested as a suspected war criminal after World War II. What some people don't know is that Nobusuke was arrested because he had been a member of the Cabinet of prime minister Hideki Tojo, who was later executed as a war criminal.
Although the International Military Tribunal for the Far East held Kishi as a suspected Class A war criminal, it acquitted him of all charges in 1952. Therefore, Kishi should not be considered a war criminal.
In 1969, two years before Taiwan was expelled from the UN, Kishi, who had retired from his post as Japanese prime minister, paid a secret visit to Taiwan to persuade dictator Chiang Kai-shek (
Surprisingly, prior to the 26th UN General Assembly, Chiang softened his stance on Taiwan's status in the UN and made a belated decision to accept the US proposal of "dual recognition" or "two Chinas," but by then it was too late.
The way some commentators have attempted to use Kishi's past to vilify Abe is misleading and malicious, and indicates that certain local media outlets are still influenced by an unnecessary hostility to anything foreign.
In addition, these media outlets have also distorted Japan's efforts to become a "normal country," portraying it as a revival of its past imperialism. From an international perspective, this is a gross misinterpretation.
Japan has already suffered the consequence of its militarism. Following World War II, it made great efforts to atone for its past atrocities in Asian countries. What's more, some Japanese politicians have even seemed to develop a fear of China when speaking of their giant neighbor.
Only after Koizumi came to power did the Japanese gradually overcome their fear of China. Although Japanese government officials have refrained from expressing deep remorse over past aggression against their Asian neighbors, in 1995 on the 50th anniversary of the end of World War II, former Japanese prime minister Murayama Tomiichi apologized for Japan's past.
It therefore seems unfair to ask a national Japanese leader born after World War II to shoulder the guilt for his country's wartime atrocities.
If Japan can successfully revise its pacifist Constitution, exercise the right of collective self-defense and normalize its international relations, that would definitely increase peace and security in the Asia-Pacific.
Only with a normalized Japan can nations in the Western Pacific deter North Korea's and China's nuclear and expansionist ambitions. That is why both countries have been most vociferous in opposing Japan's efforts to normalize itself.
Tseng Wei-chen is freelance political commentator.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with